C19 and Tennis

Our main board to talk about our sport
User avatar
Liamvalid Great Britain
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:44 pm
Location: Liverpool
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#391

Post by Liamvalid »

ponchi101 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:50 pm Nope. It has been clear that it is not a visa thing. He simply cannot show he is complying with the exceptions, or that he is vaccinated. The visa is not the issue, it is that he simply cannot comply with the requirement.
Ah ok thanks for clearing that up. If it was anyone else I would feel really bad them
Mary, queen of shots
User avatar
JazzNU United States of America
Posts: 6655
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:57 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 2758 times
Been thanked: 2354 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#392

Post by JazzNU »

Liamvalid wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:42 pm
But the medical exemption is still in place, right? It’s just the visa form being processed incorrectly that has caused him to be refused. Can’t he just re-apply for the correct visa? This is such a big story, it’s been a long while since I’ve been inspired to actually search the BBC for a tennis story!
No, not at all. His visa was being reviewed for the medical exemption of the vaccine. The Victorian government had granted that exemption to him. The Australia Border Force is a national enforcement agency, so when he landed, they reviewed his entry which includes a review of visa and vaccine status. They reviewed the evidence provided for the exemption as they would a regular person and said it was insufficient to gain entry.

Meaning it's what everyone thought. Tennis Australia struck some deal with the "independent" Victorian health panel to rubber stamp his exemption application. And whatever wheels were greased by TA to get him into the country, have fallen apart mightily.
User avatar
Liamvalid Great Britain
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:44 pm
Location: Liverpool
Has thanked: 78 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#393

Post by Liamvalid »

JazzNU wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:54 pm
Liamvalid wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:42 pm
But the medical exemption is still in place, right? It’s just the visa form being processed incorrectly that has caused him to be refused. Can’t he just re-apply for the correct visa? This is such a big story, it’s been a long while since I’ve been inspired to actually search the BBC for a tennis story!
No, not at all. His visa was being reviewed for the medical exemption of the vaccine. The Victorian government had granted that exemption to him. The Australia Border Force is a national enforcement agency, so when he landed, they reviewed his entry which includes a review of visa and vaccine status. They reviewed the evidence provided for the exemption as they would a regular person and said it was insufficient to gain entry.

Meaning it's what everyone thought. Tennis Australia struck some deal with the "independent" Victorian health panel to rubber stamp his exemption application. And whatever wheels were greased by TA to get him into the country, have fallen apart mightily.
Wow this is wild! And the Serbian president going crazy over it. Who’d have thought instead of winning 21, he’d be starting world war 3
Mary, queen of shots
User avatar
meganfernandez United States of America
Posts: 4968
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
Has thanked: 2527 times
Been thanked: 1747 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#394

Post by meganfernandez »

ponchi101 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:50 pm Nope. It has been clear that it is not a visa thing. He simply cannot show he is complying with the exceptions, or that he is vaccinated. The visa is not the issue, it is that he simply cannot comply with the requirement.
Curious, how has that been clear? All the reporting and official statement cited the visa. I didn't see any reporting that the border authorities re-evaluated the merit of his medical exemption. Do you know where that is coming from?
User avatar
dryrunguy
Posts: 1573
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:31 am
Has thanked: 693 times
Been thanked: 1155 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#395

Post by dryrunguy »

Next up from the Novax camp... Full on victimhood and martyrdom mode.
User avatar
MJ2004
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 3:18 pm
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 297 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#396

Post by MJ2004 »

JazzNU wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:54 pm Meaning it's what everyone thought. Tennis Australia struck some deal with the "independent" Victorian health panel to rubber stamp his exemption application. And whatever wheels were greased by TA to get him into the country, have fallen apart mightily.
They probably expected the national powers-that-be to rubber-stamp their move, which might have happened if s*** hadn't hit the fan yesterday and public opinion hadn't exploded. If Djoker hadn't posted from the airport and everyone had kept quiet until he was in the country, things might have gone differently.
User avatar
ti-amie United States of America
Posts: 23665
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
Location: The Boogie Down, NY
Has thanked: 5415 times
Been thanked: 3370 times

Honorary_medal

Re: C19 and Tennis

#397

Post by ti-amie »

“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
User avatar
MJ2004
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 3:18 pm
Location: Boston
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 297 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#398

Post by MJ2004 »

The subtext of his awesome reply: "we have more important, real issues to worry about related to COVID" followed by "suck it up".
dmforever
Posts: 823
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 377 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#399

Post by dmforever »

I really want to know the details. Which doctors accepted whatever evidence he offered? What evidence did he offer? Did the doctors who accepted his evidence tell him that he would have to meet a higher standard of proof upon arrival in Australia? Or was he just hoping?

What a totally insane situation.

Kevin
User avatar
JazzNU United States of America
Posts: 6655
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:57 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 2758 times
Been thanked: 2354 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#400

Post by JazzNU »

meganfernandez wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:01 pm
ponchi101 wrote: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:50 pm Nope. It has been clear that it is not a visa thing. He simply cannot show he is complying with the exceptions, or that he is vaccinated. The visa is not the issue, it is that he simply cannot comply with the requirement.
Curious, how has that been clear? All the reporting and official statement cited the visa. I didn't see any reporting that the border authorities re-evaluated the merit of his medical exemption. Do you know where that is coming from?
I posted the video on the previous page and @Ti posted it again on this one. It's 2 minutes long and worth watching. The statement from the Australia Border Force and the Health Minister make it clear that the visa holdup was about the evidence for the exemption. Maybe it was something else initially and that's why so many were reporting that part, but it's not why he's been denied.
User avatar
meganfernandez United States of America
Posts: 4968
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
Has thanked: 2527 times
Been thanked: 1747 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#401

Post by meganfernandez »

Fastbackss wrote:
meganfernandez wrote: Tue Jan 04, 2022 4:15 am . Dude’s not playing.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Things change fast!

Exemption granted
And change back just as fast!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 14911
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 3898 times
Been thanked: 5709 times
Contact:

Re: C19 and Tennis

#402

Post by ponchi101 »

JazzNu has a better explanation, but I should have said, indeed, that it was the LATEST news. Megan, you are right in that there is nothing clear about this mess.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
Owendonovan United States of America
Posts: 1047
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:08 am
Location: NYC
Has thanked: 984 times
Been thanked: 757 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#403

Post by Owendonovan »

I'm also enjoying Novax sat on a plane for 14 hours, isolated, and will have to turn around and do another 14 hour flight home again. 28+ hours airporting and on a plane over a 48 hour period, shoot me. (maybe this belongs in what level Dante?)
User avatar
meganfernandez United States of America
Posts: 4968
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
Has thanked: 2527 times
Been thanked: 1747 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#404

Post by meganfernandez »

ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 1:04 am JazzNu has a better explanation, but I should have said, indeed, that it was the LATEST news. Megan, you are right in that there is nothing clear about this mess.
I ended up finding some reporting on that. Right, not clear, but now I know where it was coming from.
User avatar
JazzNU United States of America
Posts: 6655
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2021 6:57 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 2758 times
Been thanked: 2354 times

Re: C19 and Tennis

#405

Post by JazzNU »

This is from a recent article about Djokovic that might make the border entry a bit more clear in a succinct manner.


Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews then clarified the border process.

"While the Victorian government and Tennis Australia may permit a non-vaccinated player to compete in the Australian Open, it is the Commonwealth government that will enforce our requirements at the Australian border,'' Andrews said. "If an arriving individual is not vaccinated, they must provide acceptable proof that they cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons to be able to access the same travel arrangement as fully vaccinated travelers.''



https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/ ... -exemption
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests