World News Random, Random

[ti-amie]

The AQI here is 133 and rising.

[mmmm8]

This morning, I caught a brief glimpse of the crest of the mountain on the other side of the valley where I live. Since about Noon today, I haven't been able to see it all because of the smoke. And what's happening here is NOTHING compared to what's happening in many parts of Canada and the U.S.

Someone in a meeting today stated the smoke has been reported in Portugal.

My friend in Zurich (!) says it's been making her cough all day!

[Suliso]

In Zurich??? I'm in Basel, 70 km away, and everything feels normal here.

[skatingfan]

My friend in Zurich (!) says it's been making her cough all day!

Maybe it's a bit psychosomatic.

The smoke that has made its way into Europe has done so via the jet stream – strong winds in the upper levels of the atmosphere. This means the smoke will not lead to dramatically worse surface air quality like the Northeast US experienced a few weeks ago.

“Whilst the smoke is high up in the atmosphere, it may make for some vivid sunrises and sunsets in the next few days,” the Met Office, the UK’s national weather service, wrote on Twitter.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/26/americas ... index.html

[ti-amie]

Brazilian court bars Bolsonaro from running for office
By Marina Dias
Updated June 30, 2023 at 3:27 p.m. EDT|Published June 30, 2023 at 11:33 a.m. EDT

BRASÍLIA — Brazil’s top elections court voted Friday to bar Jair Bolsonaro from running for office for eight years — a period that covers the next presidential election — for making what members of the panel said were claims he knew to be false about the integrity of the country’s voting systems.

As president, Bolsonaro, sometimes called the “Trump of the Tropics,” repeatedly asserted without evidence that the voting systems in Latin America’s largest country were vulnerable to fraud. The seven-member Superior Electoral Court voted 5-2 Friday to convict the right-wing populist of abuse of power for undermining faith in the country’s young democracy.

The ruling, if it survives an expected Supreme Court appeal, means Bolsonaro, 68, won’t be able to run for president until the 2030 election, when he’ll be 75. It is the first time in the court’s 90-year history that it has applied the ban to a former president.

Bolsonaro has denied wrongdoing. After the verdict, he said he was “stabbed in the back.”

“I would not like to become blocked from running for office,” he said. “But in politics — and this sentence is not mine — ‘nobody kills, nobody dies.’”

The former army officer won the presidency in 2018 on promises to clean up corruption in government. During his four-year term, he gutted protections for the Amazon rainforest and its Indigenous inhabitants, widened Brazil’s culture-war divisions and presided over one of the world’s deadliest coronavirus outbreaks. And now he’s being investigated for alleged corruption himself.

He left office in December after losing to Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva by the narrowest margin in the country’s presidential election history. He did not concede the race, but fled to Florida before his term ended, skipping Lula’s inauguration and the ceremonial passing of the presidential sash, a ritual meant to affirm the country’s democracy.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the president of the electoral court, said the verdict Friday would “confirm our faith in democracy” and “our degree of repulsion toward the shameful populism that has been reborn from flames of hateful and anti-democratic speech and statements that propagate disgraceful disinformation.”

Bolsonaro’s election as an outsider, actions and style in office, defeat after a single term and election denialism mirror those of his ally Donald Trump.

But the trial showed the differing responses of Brazil and the United States to their insurrections.

Trump, who is battling criminal indictments on charges of mishandling classified materials and falsifying business records, is running to return to the White House.

But Bolsonaro is now prohibited from seeking any office through the end of the decade.

The difference? Brazil has the Superior Electoral Court, which is empowered by the constitution to remove politicians from office and bar them from running again. The United States has no comparable authority.

The verdict Friday was the first in several investigations against Bolsonaro. He remains accused in multiple criminal and electoral cases.

Bolsonaro’s attorney, Tarcísio Vieira de Carvalho, said he was considering grounds for an appeal to the Supreme Court.

At issue before the court were Bolsonaro’s comments at a meeting with foreign diplomats last summer in the presidential palace. In a 45-minute address that was broadcast on national television, the panel found, he made false claims about the voting system’s vulnerability to fraud. They say the comments created the environment in which thousands of his supporters stormed the presidential palace, Congress and Supreme Court on Jan. 8 in hopes of overturning his election loss.

The complaint was brought by Brazil’s left-wing Democratic Labor Party. Moraes, head of the electoral court, has been accused by Bolsonaro’s supporters of persecuting the former president politically.

Bolsonaro’s lawyers argued that the meeting was an “act of government” with “suggestions for the electoral process.” Bolsonaro did not attend the trial, but commented from the sidelines.

“Is it fair to revoke the political rights of someone who gathered ambassadors?” the former president said to reporters Monday. “We cannot passively accept in Brazil that possible criticism or suggestions for improving the electoral system is seen as an attack on democracy.”

And on Thursday: “It’s unfair to me, for God’s sake,” he said. “Show me something concrete that I did against democracy. I played within the bounds of the constitution the whole time.”

The court, made up of a rotation of three Supreme Court justices, two other federal judges and two lawyers, found that Bolsonaro’s comments to the diplomats were part of a script that led to the Jan. 8 insurrection. In a 382-page opinion, presiding judge Benedito Gonçalves wrote that the former president “was fully, personally responsible” for attacking the electoral system and “violated his duties as a president” during the meeting.

“It is not possible to turn a blind eye to the anti-democratic effects of violent speeches and lies that jeopardize the credibility of the electoral system,” Gonçalves wrote.

Supreme Court justices agree.

“We have never had a president who has so unequivocally attacked the institutions like Bolsonaro did,” Justice Gilmar Mendes, a two-time president of the electoral court, told The Washington Post.

“And there was a context,” Mendes continued. “When he meets with ambassadors and diplomats in his position and announces defects in the electronic ballots that he knew did not exist, he is seriously abusing his power as president.”

According to the newspaper O Globo, judicial authorities warned Bolsonaro at least 31 times between July 2021 and August 2022 that he could be punished for attacking the electoral system.

Brazil’s top prosecutor for electoral cases, Paulo Gustavo Gonet Branco, said at the outset of the trial that the former president’s rhetoric “went far beyond freedom of expression.”

“Bolsonaro’s allegations were not just reckless; they were known to be unfounded,” he said.

No one in Brazil has shown Bolsonaro’s capacity to energize the right. But his allies are already seeking his replacement. They hope that casting the former president as a victim of a corrupt system will strengthen their cause.

One candidate to succeed him, supporters say, is his wife, Michelle Bolsonaro. Another is Tarcísio de Freitas, Bolsonaro’s conservative former infrastructure minister and now governor of São Paulo state, Brazil’s largest.

“President Bolsonaro’s leadership as a representative of the Brazilian right is unquestionable and endures,” Freitas tweeted. “Tens of millions of people count on your voice. We are together, Mr. President.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... on-brazil/

[ponchi101]

Talk about a country between Scylla and Charybdis.

[ti-amie]

[mmmm8]

Very good points - Sweden was Russia's greatest rival for a couple centuries, which is not often remembered elsewhere because Sweden declined compared to other European colonial empires.

[ti-amie]

This gallery is something and it's only Tuesday

https://www.theguardian.com/news/galler ... est-photos

[ti-amie]

[dryrunguy]

So... This happened. For a long time.

Typos send millions of U.S. military emails to Russian ally Mali

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66226873

[ponchi101]

Take steps to address the issue.

This frigging forum has code to avoid receiving or delivering mails to mails with certain extensions. And the US military doesn't?

[ti-amie]

Take steps to address the issue.

This frigging forum has code to avoid receiving or delivering mails to mails with certain extensions. And the US military doesn't?

SMH

[ti-amie]

There is horrific video out of Manipur state in India. The violence shown happened this past May. How was this not widely talked about until now?

[Owendonovan]

I don't see this ending well, at all. Bibi may have just killed Israel.

Changes to Judiciary Deepen Split in Israel as Opponents Weigh Options
The law is the first step by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to curb the influence of the judiciary. The nation’s largest union is weighing a general strike.
After a night of furious mass protests that shut down major roadways and included threats of a general strike, Israelis on Tuesday confronted a divided nation, some celebrating and some seething over the passage of a highly contentious law that limits the Supreme Court’s ability to check governmental power.

The law is the first step in a broader effort by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government — the most ultranationalist and religiously conservative in Israeli history — to curb the influence of the judiciary, which Mr. Netanyahu’s supporters say stands in the way of their vision for the country.

Mr. Netanyahu, fresh from receiving a pacemaker over the weekend, delivered a televised address on Monday evening in which he suggested he might pause the broader judicial overhaul until late November. His message, however, failed to quell the public unrest. Well past midnight, protesters flooded the streets of Jerusalem and other cities, burning tires and facing down police forces firing water cannons.

Quiet generally prevailed across the country on Tuesday, with most protesters who had camped out near the Parliament having packed up after a city eviction order, and police officers barring a small group of demonstrators from approaching the building.

But how the deeper political crisis might be resolved remains unclear. Opposition activists said they had already asked Israel’s Supreme Court to review the law limiting its powers. A decision could take months, but the case would set up a crisis among the branches of the Israeli government.

Here’s what else to know:

The Israeli Medical Association, which represents 97 percent of Israel’s doctors, declared a strike in much of the country for Tuesday, saying its members outside Jerusalem, the capital, would handle only emergencies and critical care needs. Separately, the country’s largest union has threatened to declare a general strike, after widespread work stoppages in March helped push Mr. Netanyahu to suspend some of his overhaul plans.

Israel’s nationalist right celebrated the law’s passage. “From today, Israel will be a little more democratic, a little more Jewish, and we will be able to do more in our offices,” the ultranationalist minister Itamar Ben-Gvir told reporters on Monday. “With God’s help, this will be just be the beginning.”

After Parliament approved the judicial law 64 to 0, with opposition lawmakers in the 120-member Knesset boycotting the vote, the White House said it was “unfortunate” that it had passed with “the slimmest possible majority.” In a statement, the White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, said that the United States supported Israeli leaders’ efforts “to build a broader consensus through political dialogue.”
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/07/25 ... e-protests