Talk About Tennis 2.0

In case you forgot about this one, she went around extorting raising billions of dollars for a medical treatment that she said she invented and never did. She's being sentenced now because when she was supposed to be sentenced before she found herself pregnant - twice.












P1

P2

P3











scott budman @scottbudman
Alex Shultz, voice shaking, recalls Theranos lawyers coming into his house "without Tyler having any way to represent himself."

"Home should be a safe place for the family, right?"

P4

P5

And she thought being pregnant for sentencing would get her out of jail, instead she's having a baby in jail. Not sure if she can keep the baby in jail, but there's a father of the baby on the outside.

Straight No Chaser @serioustalk01
Replying to
@gulovsen and @TiffanyFong_
That was competent representation.

MindF_ck :toad:
@Gal_suburban@toad.social
Judge J. Michael Luttig himself today on Post wrote that he will be joining as co-counsel with Neal Katyal in arguing for respondents against the Independent State Legislature Doctrine/Theory.

"Moore v. Harper the most important case for American Democracy since the founding of the nation." -- Judge J. Michael Luttig

THAT'S how dire this case is. Messaging that is clear, concise and captivating is essential to motivate Democracy First Americans to express their outrage.

Get loud! Stay loud!




https://toad.social/@Gal_suburban/109402716972361492

MindF_ck :toad:
@Gal_suburban@toad.social
Remarkably bipartisan expert opposition

8 amicus curiae briefs filed by/on behalf of prominent conservative & Republican constitutional lawyers:

▪Judge J. Michael Luttig
▪Steven Calabresi, Federalist Society
▪Benjamin Ginsberg
▪Thomas Griffith
▪Charles Fried, Reagan’s solicitor general
▪John Danforth, chief Senate sponsor of Justice Thomas’s nomination to the SCOTUS
▪Carter Phillips, deputy solicitor general under Reagan, who has argued more cases before SCOTUS than anyone in history.

Teri Kanefield
@Teri_Kanefield@law-and-politics.online

Here are the elements of seditious conspiracy (see attached)


The key to this crime is the use of force.

The prosecutions started with the easy ones: Vandalism, etc. and progressed to seditious conspiracy

Treason is almost impossible to charge. It’s defined in the Constitution as:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."



2/
The Supreme Court has said that the “enemy” must be a country in which we are at open war–meaning a war declared by Congress.

This means that seditious conspiracy is the closest we have to a charge of treason.

It's also hard to prove.

The defendants are members of an extremist group.

Stewart Rhodes is a dangerous guy. Here is how the Southern Poverty Law Center describes him:

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/ex


https://law-and-politics.online/@Teri_K ... 3363772873