Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:02 pm
Talk About Tennis 2.0
We still talk about tennis. And much more.
https://www.talkabouttennis2.com/
Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Page 6 of 17
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:07 pm
That's a very interesting boy band.
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:08 pm
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:56 pm
I would name the boy band 'Novak and the Vaccinated'.
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:18 pm
Post of the month.
---o---
Rafaello & Di Carbonaras
(They are in Italy, after all).
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:39 pm
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 12:32 am
What is this surface? Linoleum?
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 3:20 am
Sigh. My boy has no chance on that surface.
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 3:54 am
Not for me. Saying 0% means it is absolutely... 100% impossible... that any of the four of them win.ashkor87 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 3:58 pmFor all practical purposes, 2% is 0% ,isn't it? It is just a way of expressing, no exact science is involved!
It's not equal to 2%.Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:43 am
The purpose of probabilities is to convey how much chance I think someone has..obviously there is no exactness about a purely subjective estimate..so 2% is the same, to me, as 0%
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:46 am
If you're saying 12% is the same as 10% sure, there's not much difference there.
But 0 % means absolutely, no possible chance at all. Just like you can't say you're 100% sure something will happen, then later say "Well 100% is the same as 98%."
If your 0% means 2% then... I'm not going to worry about it one of the four wins.
But 0 % means absolutely, no possible chance at all. Just like you can't say you're 100% sure something will happen, then later say "Well 100% is the same as 98%."
If your 0% means 2% then... I'm not going to worry about it one of the four wins.
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 12:41 pm
So who of these guys would prefer the fastest possible indoor court? I think we can rule out Nadal and Ruud. Perhaps FAA would particularly like it? I'm not sure...
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 3:14 pm
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:07 pm
FAA and Fritz.
Rafa and Ruud, as you say, would have it.
Medvedev, with his "I'm in the parking lot" return of serve, would have no chance.
Rublev, with his extreme FH, would shank 1 out of 2.
Novak would be so frustrated, unable to track down that second shot.
Fritz would love the short points. FAA too.
Rafa and Ruud, as you say, would have it.
Medvedev, with his "I'm in the parking lot" return of serve, would have no chance.
Rublev, with his extreme FH, would shank 1 out of 2.
Novak would be so frustrated, unable to track down that second shot.
Fritz would love the short points. FAA too.
Re: Turin. World Tour Finals (ATP)
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:10 pm
Zero. Perhaps the most potent mathematical number of them all. Together with infinity (which is not a "number", is a concept).ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:46 am If you're saying 12% is the same as 10% sure, there's not much difference there.
But 0 % means absolutely, no possible chance at all. Just like you can't say you're 100% sure something will happen, then later say "Well 100% is the same as 98%."
If your 0% means 2% then... I'm not going to worry about it one of the four wins.