by ti-amie THE CHAMPIONSHIPS, WIMBLEDON 2024
INTENDED ORDER OF PLAY FOR DAY 4 THURSDAY 4 JULY


Complete/Revised

CENTRE COURT - 1:30PM

1. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Jacob Fearnley (GBR) v Novak Djokovic (SRB) [2]
2. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Iga Swiatek (POL) [1] v Petra Martic (CRO)
3. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Rinky Hijikata (AUS) / John Peers (AUS) v Andy Murray (GBR) / Jamie Murray (GBR)

NO.1 COURT - 1:00PM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Katie Boulter (GBR) [32] v Harriet Dart (GBR)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Jack Draper (GBR) [28] v Cameron Norrie (GBR)
3. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Marcos Giron (USA) v Alexander Zverev (GER) [4]

NO.2 COURT - 11:00AM

1. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Hubert Hurkacz (POL) [7] v Arthur Fils (FRA)
Not Before: 1:00pm
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Gael Monfils (FRA) leads Stan Wawrinka (SUI) To Finish 7-6(5) 6-4 5-5
3. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Ons Jabeur (TUN) [10] v Robin Montgomery (USA)
4. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Elena Rybakina (KAZ) [4] v Laura Siegemund (GER)

NO.3 COURT - 11:00AM

1. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Jaume Munar (ESP) v Alex de Minaur (AUS) [9]
2. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Xinyu Wang (CHN) v Jessica Pegula (USA) [5]
3. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Danielle Collins (USA) [11] v Dalma Galfi (HUN)
4. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Emil Ruusuvuori (FIN) v Stefanos Tsitsipas (GRE) [11]

COURT 12 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Yafan Wang (CHN) v Madison Keys (USA) [12]
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Grigor Dimitrov (BUL) [10] v Juncheng Shang (CHN)
3. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Taylor Fritz (USA) [13] v Arthur Rinderknech (FRA)
Not Before: 4:30pm
4. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Caroline Wozniacki (DEN) v Leylah Fernandez (CAN) [30]

COURT 18 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Daria Kasatkina [14] v Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Lloyd Harris (RSA) v Ben Shelton (USA) [14]
3. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Holger Rune (DEN) [15] v Thiago Seyboth Wild (BRA)
Not Before: 5:30pm
4. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Elina Avanesyan v Liudmila Samsonova [15]

COURT 4 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Cristina Bucsa (ESP) v Jessica Bouzas Maneiro (ESP)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Luciano Darderi (ITA) v Lorenzo Musetti (ITA) [25]
3. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Diana Shnaider / Elena Vesnina v Yulia Putintseva (KAZ) / Clara Tauson (DEN)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Harriet Dart (GBR) / Maia Lumsden (GBR) v Sara Errani (ITA) / Jasmine Paolini (ITA) [5]

COURT 5 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Magdalena Frech (POL) / Katarzyna Kawa (POL) v Anna Danilina (KAZ) / Yifan Xu (CHN)
2. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Marcelo Demoliner (BRA) / Daniil Medvedev v Gonzalo Escobar (ECU) / Aleksandr Nedovyesov (KAZ)
3. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Emma Navarro (USA) / Diane Parry (FRA) v Lucia Bronzetti (ITA) / Varvara Gracheva (FRA)
4. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Alexander Erler (AUT) / Lucas Miedler (AUT) v Neal Skupski (GBR) / Michael Venus (NZL) [9]
5. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Anna Blinkova / Mayar Sherif (EGY) v Eri Hozumi (JPN) / Moyuka Uchijima (JPN)

COURT 6 - 11:00AM

1. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Victor Cornea (ROU) / Fabian Marozsan (HUN) v Andreas Mies (GER) / John-Patrick Smith (AUS)
2. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
N.Sriram Balaji (IND) / Luke Johnson (GBR) v Marcelo Arevalo (ESA) / Mate Pavic (CRO) [4]
3. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Giuliana Olmos (MEX) / Alexandra Panova [13] v Marta Kostyuk (UKR) / Elena-Gabriela Ruse (ROU)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Ingrid Gamarra Martins (BRA) / Beatriz Haddad Maia (BRA) v Irina Khromacheva / Kamilla Rakhimova
5. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Santiago Gonzalez (MEX) / Edouard Roger-Vasselin (FRA) [6] v Daniel Evans (GBR) / Henry Searle (GBR)

COURT 7 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Tereza Mihalikova (SVK) / Olivia Nicholls (GBR) v Demi Schuurs (NED) / Luisa Stefani (BRA) [6]
2. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Caroline Dolehide (USA) / Desirae Krawczyk (USA) [7] v Shuko Aoyama (JPN) / Aleksandra Krunic (SRB)
3. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Xiyu Wang (CHN) / Lin Zhu (CHN) v Emily Appleton (GBR) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Cristina Bucsa (ESP) / Nao Hibino (JPN) v Tatjana Maria (GER) / Arantxa Rus (NED)
5. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Hailey Baptiste (USA) / Alycia Parks (USA) v Makoto Ninomiya (JPN) / Fang-Hsien Wu (TPE)

COURT 8 - 11:00AM COURT 9 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Sarah Beth Grey (GBR) / Tara Moore (GBR) v Nicole Melichar-Martinez (USA) / Ellen Perez (AUS) [3]
2. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Alexander Bublik (KAZ) / Alexander Shevchenko (KAZ) v Yuki Bhambri (IND) / Albano Olivetti (FRA)
3. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Fabrice Martin (FRA) / Matwe Middelkoop (NED) v Tallon Griekspoor (NED) / Bart Stevens (NED)
4. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Marcel Granollers (ESP) / Horacio Zeballos (ARG) [1] v Arthur Fils (FRA) / Ugo Humbert (FRA)
5. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Magda Linette (POL) / Peyton Stearns (USA) v Ana Bogdan (ROU) / Jaqueline Cristian (ROU)

COURT 10 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Asia Muhammad (USA) / Aldila Sutjiadi (INA) [15] v Irina-Camelia Begu (ROU) / Martina Trevisan (ITA)
2. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Jay Clarke (GBR) / Marcus Willis (GBR) v Max Purcell (AUS) / Jordan Thompson (AUS) [15]
3. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Katerina Siniakova (CZE) / Taylor Townsend (USA) [4] v Rebeka Masarova (ESP) / Linda Noskova (CZE)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Naiktha Bains (GBR) / Amelia Rajecki (GBR) v Timea Babos (HUN) / Nadiia Kichenok (UKR)
5. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Miriam Kolodziejova (CZE) / Anna Siskova (CZE) v Lauren Davis (USA) / Kimberley Zimmermann (BEL)

COURT 11 - 11:00AM

1. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Rajeev Ram (USA) / Joe Salisbury (GBR) [3] v William Blumberg (USA) / Casper Ruud (NOR)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Tomas Martin Etcheverry (ARG) [30] v Alexei Popyrin (AUS)
3. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Sadio Doumbia (FRA) / Fabien Reboul (FRA) [16] v Oliver Crawford (GBR) / Kyle Edmund (GBR)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Katarzyna Piter (POL) / Viktoriya Tomova (BUL) v Clara Burel (FRA) / Camila Osorio (COL)
5. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Christopher Eubanks (USA) / Evan King (USA) v Liam Broady (GBR) / Billy Harris (GBR)

COURT 14 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Marta Kostyuk (UKR) [18] v Daria Saville (AUS)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Flavio Cobolli (ITA) v Alejandro Tabilo (CHI) [24]
3. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard (FRA) v Yoshihito Nishioka (JPN)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Su-Wei Hsieh (TPE) / Elise Mertens (BEL) [1] v Alicia Barnett (GBR) / Freya Christie (GBR)

COURT 15 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Yulia Putintseva (KAZ) v Katerina Siniakova (CZE) [27]
2. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Camila Osorio (COL) v Beatriz Haddad Maia (BRA) [20]
3. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Anna Kalinskaya [17] v Marie Bouzkova (CZE)
4. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Quentin Halys (FRA) v Karen Khachanov [21]
5. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Tomas Machac (CZE) / Zhizhen Zhang (CHN) v Ariel Behar (URU) / Adam Pavlasek (CZE)
1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Barbora Krejcikova (CZE) [31] v Katie Volynets (USA)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Tomas Machac (CZE) v Roman Safiullin
3. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Thanasi Kokkinakis (AUS) v Lucas Pouille (FRA)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Greet Minnen (BEL) / Heather Watson (GBR) v Sofia Kenin (USA) / Bethanie Mattek-Sands (USA) [14]

COURT 16 - 11:00AM

1. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Francisco Comesana (ARG) v Adam Walton (AUS)
2. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Daria Snigur (UKR) v Jelena Ostapenko (LAT) [13]
3. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Caroline Garcia (FRA) [23] v Bernarda Pera (USA)
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Lyudmyla Kichenok (UKR) / Jelena Ostapenko (LAT) [9] v Daria Saville (AUS) / Yue Yuan (CHN)
5. Gentlemen's Doubles - First Round
Federico Coria (ARG) / Mariano Navone (ARG) v Wesley Koolhof (NED) / Nikola Mektic (CRO) [7]

COURT 17 - 11:00AM

1. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Paula Badosa (ESP) v Brenda Fruhvirtova (CZE)
2. Gentlemen's Singles - Second Round
Denis Shapovalov (CAN) v Daniel Altmaier (GER)
3. Ladies' Singles - Second Round
Jule Niemeier (GER) v Elina Svitolina (UKR) [21]
4. Ladies' Doubles - First Round
Coco Gauff (USA) / Jessica Pegula (USA) [11] v Anhelina Kalinina (UKR) / Dayana Yastremska (UKR)



The Committee, while adhering as closely as possible to the order of play given, is unable to guarantee that it will be maintained in its entirety.
This may result in matches being moved from one court to another. DENISE PARNELL - REFEREE

by Suliso Hurkacz injured his knee and was forced to retire just when it looked he's about to level at two sets a piece... What a rotten luck on his favorite surface. Great result for young Adrthur Fils of course.

by meganfernandez
Suliso wrote:Hurkacz injured his knee and was forced to retire just when it looked he's about to level at two sets a piece... What a rotten luck on his favorite surface. Great result for young Adrthur Fils of course.
Super sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

by meganfernandez Pegula out... fought off match points in the second and won it with a tremendous winner, chasing down a rop shot and whipping a passing shot, and then meekly lost the third. It was windy, but still. Was defending semifinal points. When will she drop out of the top 10?

David Witt is available again. Maybe they should reunite.

Roddick had Pegula beating Iga and making the final. :lol:

by mick1303 This artificial match interruption "due to darkness" IMO destroys the natural flow of the matches. Slams supposed to be played over 5 sets. And it puts a major premium on the fitness. But when losing players gets "out of jail card" it messes up the logic of the match. The player who is winning 2 sets then has a pressure to finish before darkness and is mentally at huge disadvantage. I believe this is what happened to FAA (and we've seen these scenarios many times in the past). It maybe good for the drama, but bad for enforcing the sports principle of honest competition. Getting the normal lights for outer courts is ten times cheaper than building the roof. I think they are not doing this, because the principle of fair play for them is secondary, while the premium is the convenience for their community. But I'm sure there are plenty of other communities that would be happy to hold such an event and they can put the convenience of players ahead of their own convenience (given how much revenue such tournament provides). US Open and Australian Open changed their location over the years. So for the slam to change location is not out of the question.

by meganfernandez
mick1303 wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:20 pm This artificial match interruption "due to darkness" IMO destroys the natural flow of the matches. Slams supposed to be played over 5 sets. And it puts a major premium on the fitness. But when losing players gets "out of jail card" it messes up the logic of the match. The player who is winning 2 sets then has a pressure to finish before darkness and is mentally at huge disadvantage. I believe this is what happened to FAA (and we've seen these scenarios many times in the past). It maybe good for the drama, but bad for enforcing the sports principle of honest competition. Getting the normal lights for outer courts is ten times cheaper than building the roof. I think they are not doing this, because the principle of fair play for them is secondary, while the premium is the convenience for their community. But I'm sure there are plenty of other communities that would be happy to hold such an event and they can put the convenience of players ahead of their own convenience (given how much revenue such tournament provides). US Open and Australian Open changed their location over the years. So for the slam to change location is not out of the question.
B3 in the first week fixes the problem.

by mick1303
meganfernandez wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:22 pm
mick1303 wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:20 pm This artificial match interruption "due to darkness" IMO destroys the natural flow of the matches. Slams supposed to be played over 5 sets. And it puts a major premium on the fitness. But when losing players gets "out of jail card" it messes up the logic of the match. The player who is winning 2 sets then has a pressure to finish before darkness and is mentally at huge disadvantage. I believe this is what happened to FAA (and we've seen these scenarios many times in the past). It maybe good for the drama, but bad for enforcing the sports principle of honest competition. Getting the normal lights for outer courts is ten times cheaper than building the roof. I think they are not doing this, because the principle of fair play for them is secondary, while the premium is the convenience for their community. But I'm sure there are plenty of other communities that would be happy to hold such an event and they can put the convenience of players ahead of their own convenience (given how much revenue such tournament provides). US Open and Australian Open changed their location over the years. So for the slam to change location is not out of the question.
B3 in the first week fixes the problem.
In this case we are losing the point of comparison. The slam where all 7 matches were played BO5 historically shall be considered a bigger achievement (and rightly so) than the one where some matches were BO3. It will be a shame if slams will be devalued in such a way.

by Jeff from TX
meganfernandez wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:20 pm Pegula out... fought off match points in the second and won it with a tremendous winner, chasing down a rop shot and whipping a passing shot, and then meekly lost the third. It was windy, but still. Was defending semifinal points. When will she drop out of the top 10?

David Witt is available again. Maybe they should reunite.

Roddick had Pegula beating Iga and making the final. :lol:
Actually, Pegula was defending QF points. She has never made the semis of a major. Bad loss for her.

by meganfernandez
Jeff from TX wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:38 pm
meganfernandez wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:20 pm Pegula out... fought off match points in the second and won it with a tremendous winner, chasing down a rop shot and whipping a passing shot, and then meekly lost the third. It was windy, but still. Was defending semifinal points. When will she drop out of the top 10?

David Witt is available again. Maybe they should reunite.

Roddick had Pegula beating Iga and making the final. :lol:
Actually, Pegula was defending QF points. She has never made the semis of a major. Bad loss for her.
Oh, you're right, sorry.

by meganfernandez
mick1303 wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:30 pm
meganfernandez wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:22 pm
mick1303 wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 3:20 pm This artificial match interruption "due to darkness" IMO destroys the natural flow of the matches. Slams supposed to be played over 5 sets. And it puts a major premium on the fitness. But when losing players gets "out of jail card" it messes up the logic of the match. The player who is winning 2 sets then has a pressure to finish before darkness and is mentally at huge disadvantage. I believe this is what happened to FAA (and we've seen these scenarios many times in the past). It maybe good for the drama, but bad for enforcing the sports principle of honest competition. Getting the normal lights for outer courts is ten times cheaper than building the roof. I think they are not doing this, because the principle of fair play for them is secondary, while the premium is the convenience for their community. But I'm sure there are plenty of other communities that would be happy to hold such an event and they can put the convenience of players ahead of their own convenience (given how much revenue such tournament provides). US Open and Australian Open changed their location over the years. So for the slam to change location is not out of the question.
B3 in the first week fixes the problem.
In this case we are losing the point of comparison. The slam where all 7 matches were played BO5 historically shall be considered a bigger achievement (and rightly so) than the one where some matches were BO3. It will be a shame if slams will be devalued in such a way.
No one devalues the World Tour Finals or Masters tournaments because they aren't B5 anymore. It wouldn't matter, especially if week 2 is still B5. I bet a lot of B3 matches now are just as long, time-wise, as B5 matches used to be, when points were shorter.

by ponchi101 And the WTF are one step BELOW a slam, precisely because of those reasons.
Played all over the place, BO3 matches. It has no historic venue to call home, and there is a lot of tradition that was lost.

The AELTC will never move from their location because, well, it is a club. And the moment they were to move, a lot of the prestige would go.

by meganfernandez
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 4:59 pm And the WTF are one step BELOW a slam, precisely because of those reasons.
Played all over the place, BO3 matches. It has no historic venue to call home, and there is a lot of tradition that was lost.

The AELTC will never move from their location because, well, it is a club. And the moment they were to move, a lot of the prestige would go.
The WTF was always below Slams. Not because it was B5, but because it wasn't 7 rounds at the most prestigious events. The [point is to compare the tournament under B3/B5 to the tournament under all B5. And the reputation of the WTF and Masters didn't change when they dumped B5. We don't value them less than we did when they played B5 (in finals, at least). Slam reputation would be just fine with B3/B5.

by Suliso A strange match between Swiatek and Martic. Only 3 break points the entire match (all for Iga).

by jazzyg So the top British players on both sides of the draw go down to fellow Brits, and neither result was a big surprise. Boulter was a point or two away from losing to Dart when they played three weeks ago on grass and had to be feeling tremendous pressure. That's a match she should not have lost, particularly after going up 6-2 in the match tiebreak, but it is understandable.

The ESPN announcers tried to explain away Draper's five-set win against career journeyman Elias Ymer as the function of Ymer playing fantastic (and maybe he did; I didn't see the match), but it did not bode well for his matchup with Norrie, who made the semis two years ago. After breaking a long skid in the first round, he had to relish the opportunity to take Draper down. One of the ESPN commentators predicted his win yesterday. He's a dogged competitor.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie
Suliso wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:45 pm Hurkacz injured his knee and was forced to retire just when it looked he's about to level at two sets a piece... What a rotten luck on his favorite surface. Great result for young Adrthur Fils of course.

by martini4me After about an hour pause, Fernandez and Wozniacki are resuming their match on Centre Court. The court was called at 3-3 in the third set due to darkness (Wozniacki had been asking for it to be suspended for a while already before that). Then, before the players left the court, the tournament referee (I think) was on the phone, checking to see whether they could finish the match on an indoor court. The farewell ceremony for Andy Murray was just starting at the time, and there was still a match going on Court 1. The weather forecast for tomorrow is not good, so I guess they really wanted to get this one finished, to avoid potentially having to finish this match on Saturday, when everyone else on this side of the draw was already playing their third round match.

by ti-amie
martini4me wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:52 pm After about an hour pause, Fernandez and Wozniacki are resuming their match on Centre Court. The court was called at 3-3 in the third set due to darkness (Wozniacki had been asking for it to be suspended for a while already before that). Then, before the players left the court, the tournament referee (I think) was on the phone, checking to see whether they could finish the match on an indoor court. The farewell ceremony for Andy Murray was just starting at the time, and there was still a match going on Court 1. The weather forecast for tomorrow is not good, so I guess they really wanted to get this one finished, to avoid potentially having to finish this match on Saturday, when everyone else on this side of the draw was already playing their third round match.
I was wondering what happened. Thanks.

by martini4me
ti-amie wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:00 pm
Suliso wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 1:45 pm Hurkacz injured his knee and was forced to retire just when it looked he's about to level at two sets a piece... What a rotten luck on his favorite surface. Great result for young Arthur Fils of course.
The sequence that followed this point was even crazier. As the commentator noted, there was nothing in the dive to indicate a knee injury. But when he tried to stand up, the right leg couldn't support him and he fell back to the grass. He was on the ground for quite a while. Fils came around to check on him, then a physio. He didn't get up for about three minutes, finally took a few hobbling steps and then eventually hopped to his chair on his left foot. He then received a lengthy MTO where they put a lot of wrap on his leg, above, below and on the knee.

Hurkacz had won the point (on his own sever) where he injured his knee setting up set point in a tie-break. Even though he was still limping badly, he hobbled back out to return serve. And on the first point, he came up to net, and dove (unsuccessfully) for a ball again! Fils won the next point on his serve to set up match point. And THEN Hurkacz retired!! He couldn't just hit an underarm serve to let Fils win the point and the match?

by ponchi101 This grass season has been so dangerous.

by ponchi101
meganfernandez wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 5:06 pm
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jul 04, 2024 4:59 pm And the WTF are one step BELOW a slam, precisely because of those reasons.
Played all over the place, BO3 matches. It has no historic venue to call home, and there is a lot of tradition that was lost.

The AELTC will never move from their location because, well, it is a club. And the moment they were to move, a lot of the prestige would go.
The WTF was always below Slams. Not because it was B5, but because it wasn't 7 rounds at the most prestigious events. The [point is to compare the tournament under B3/B5 to the tournament under all B5. And the reputation of the WTF and Masters didn't change when they dumped B5. We don't value them less than we did when they played B5 (in finals, at least). Slam reputation would be just fine with B3/B5.
Not sure. Look at what happened to the Davis Cup when it changed their format. It was already downtrodden, but now it is truly a 2nd class tournament.

by mick1303 I would not say that nobody pays attention to the MS 1000 and YEC getting rid of 5-set finals. Some do notice those things )) for instance, Federer won more of those than Nadal and Djokovic. The same with YEC, yes Novak won 7 against 6 for Fed. But none of his 7 were BO5, while Fed won 3 BO5 out of his 6.