by ti-amie Men's Entry List

Image

by ti-amie Image

by ti-amie Image

by ti-amie Image

by ti-amie This might be easier to read for some.

Women's Singles Draw

BARTY A (1)
vs SORRIBES TORMO S
FERRO F vs SEVASTOVA A
FRIEDSAM AL vs WATSON H
ERRANI S vs PAVLYUCHENKOVA A (13)

BENCIC B (9) vs PEGULA J
DOI M vs ZARAZUA R
FERNANDEZ LA vs YASTREMSKA D
DIYAS Z vs KREJCIKOVA B (8)

SABALENKA A (3) vs LINETTE M
GARCIA C vs VEKIC D
SHERIF M vs PETERSON R
STOSUR S vs RYBAKINA E (15)

KVITOVA P (10) vs PAOLINI J
JOROVIC I vs van UYTVANCK A
CEPEDE ROYG V vs WANG Q
KUDERMETOVA V vs MUGURUZA G (7)

PLISKOVA K (5) vs CORNET A
SUAREZ NAVARRO C vs JABEUR O
OSTAPENKO J vs VESNINA E
GIORGI C vs BRADY J (11)

SAKKARI M (14) vs KONTAVEIT A
STOJANOVIC N vs HIBINO N
SHVEDOVA Y vs TOMLJANOVIC A
SIEGEMUND L vs SVITOLINA E (4)

SWIATEK I (6) vs BARTHEL M
BADOSA P vs MLADENOVIC K
PUTINTSEVA Y vs PODOROSKA N
ALEKSANDROVA E vs MERTENS E (12)

BERTENS K (16) vs VONDROUSOVA M
BUZARNESCU M vs RISKE A
OSORIO SERRANO M C vs GOLUBIC V
ZHENG S vs OSAKA N (2)

by ti-amie Again this could be easier for some.

Mens Singles Draw

SRB DJOKOVIC N 1
vs BOL DELLIEN H
GER STRUFF JL vs BRA MONTEIRO T
ITA MUSETTI L vs AUS MILLMAN J
POR SOUSA P vs ESP DAVIDOVICH FOKINA 16

FRA MONFILS G 10 vs BLR IVASHKA I
KAZ KUKUSHKIN M vs ARG CORIA F
SVK GOMBOS N vs USA GIRON M
JPN NISHIKORI K vs ROC RUBLEV A 5

GER ZVEREV A 4 vs TPE LU YH
COL GALAN DE vs EGY SAFWAT M
GEO BASILASHVILI N vs ESP CARBALLES BAENA R
JPN DANIEL T vs ITA SONEGO L 13

ROC KARATSEV A 11 vs USA PAUL T
FRA CHARDY J vs CHI BARRIOS T
ARG CERUNDOLO F vs GBR BROADY L
HUN FUCSOVICS M vs POL HURKACZ H 7


ARG SCHWARTZMAN D 8 vs PER VARILLAS JP
CZE MACHAC T vs POR SOUSA J
SVK KLEIN L vs AUS DUCKWORTH J
JPN NISHIOKA Y vs ROC KHACHANOV K 12

FRA HUMBERT U 14 vs ESP ANDUJAR P
POL MAJCHRZAK K vs SRB KECMANOVIC M
KOR KWON S vs USA TIAFOE F
GER KOHLSCHREIBER P vs GRE TSITSIPAS S 3

ESP CARRENO BUSTA P 6 vs USA SANDGREN T
CRO CILIC M vs BRA MENEZES J
GER KOEPFER D vs ARG BAGNIS F
GBR MURRAY A vs CAN AUGER-ALIASSIME F 9

ITA FOGNINI F 15 vs JPN SUGITA Y
BLR GERASIMOV E vs FRA SIMON G
IND NAGAL S vs UZB ISTOMIN D
KAZ BUBLIK A vs ROC MEDVEDEV D 2

by ponchi101 I still say Novak gets it, but not so automatic. A path of: Struff, Rublev, Zverev/Hurkac and Medvedev?

by dmforever In case you are interested in watching the tennis, NBC has it streaming live. Yaaay internet. :)

https://www.nbcolympics.com/schedule/sport/tennis


Kevin

by JTContinental Veronica Cepede Royg inexplicably has been given a wild card for the third Olympics in a row.

by dmforever
JTContinental wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 6:21 pm Veronica Cepede Royg inexplicably has been given a wild card for the third Olympics in a row.
I was going to ask how the selections were made. I know that a country can't have more than a certain number of singles players and doubles teams, and that rankings are involved as well, but after that, is is just up to someone to choose fairly randomly? Mohamed Safwat got in for Egypt too and his ranking is 171. Cool for Royg and Safwat, but I'm curious how that happens.

Kevin

by Suliso I think these are continental representatives. Safwat must be the highest ranked male African player.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie Centre Court: Singles & Doubles First Round REVISED

22:00

Women's Singles First Round
POL SWIATEK Iga vs GER Barthel Mona
Men's Singles First Round
KAZ A. BUBLIK vs ROC D. MEDVEDEV
Women's Singles First Round
KAZ Z. DIYAS vs CZE B. KREJCIKOVA

Men's Singles First Round
SRB N. DJOKOVIC vs BOL H. DELLIEN

Court 1: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Singles First Round
POL I. SWIATEK vs GER M. BARTHEL

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
JPN DANIEL T. vs ITA L. SONEGO

To Follow

Women's Singles First Round
SUI B. BENCIC vs USA J. PEGULA

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
ESP P. CARRENO BUSTA vs USA T. SANDGREN

Court 2: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Men's Singles First Round
POR P. SOUSA vs ESP DAVIDOVICH FOKINA


Women's Singles First Round
AUS S. STOSUR vs KAZ E. RYBAKINA


Men's Singles First Round
ROC A. KARATSEV vs USA T. PAUL

To Follow

Women's Singles First Round
NED K. BERTENS vs CZE M. VONDROUSOVA

Court 3: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Singles First Round
ITA S. ERRANI vs ROC A. PAVLYUCHENKOVA


Women's Singles First Round
GRE M. SAKKARI vs EST A. KONTAVEIT

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
ITA F. FOGNINI vs JPN SUGITA Y.

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
CRO M. CILIC vs BRA J. MENEZES

Court 4: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Singles First Round
SRB N. STOJANOVIC vs JPN HIBINO N.

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
GEO N. BASILASHVILI vs ESP R. CARBALLES BAENA


Men's Singles First Round
FRA U. HUMBERT vs ESP P. ANDUJAR

To Follow

Women's Singles First Round
JPN DOI M. vs MEX R. ZARAZUA

Court 5: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Men's Doubles First Round
GER KRAWIETZ/PUETZ vs ARG BAGNIS/SCHWARTZMAN

To Follow

Men's Doubles First Round
GBR MURRAY/SALISBURY vs FRA HERBERT/MAHUT

To Follow

Women's Doubles First Round
JPN HIBINO/NINOMIYA vs AUS BARTY/SANDERS

To Follow

Men's Doubles First Round
JPN MCLACHLAN/NISHIKORI vs POR SOUSA/SOUSA

Court 6: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Singles First Round
CAN L.A. FERNANDEZ vs UKR D. YASTREMSKA


Men's Singles First Round
GER J.L. STRUFF vs BRA T. MONTEIRO

To Follow

Women's Doubles First Round
FRA CORNET/FERRO vs UKR SVITOLINA/YASTREMSKA

To Follow

Men's Doubles First Round
GER STRUFF/ZVEREV vs POL HURKACZ/KUBOT

Court 7: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Singles First Round
GER A.L. FRIEDSAM vs GBR H. WATSON

To Follow

Women's Singles First Round
EGY M. SHERIF vs SWE R. PETERSON


Men's Singles First Round
POL K. MAJCHRZAK vs SRB M. KECMANOVIC

To Follow

Women's Doubles First Round
CHN XU/YANG vs SRB KRUNIC/STOJANOVIC

Court 8: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Doubles First Round
CAN DABROWSKI/FICHMAN vs BRA PIGOSSI/STEFANI

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
FRA J. CHARDY vs CHI T. BARRIOS


Men's Singles First Round
BLR E. GERASIMOV vs FRA G. SIMON


Men's Doubles First Round
KAZ BUBLIK/GOLUBEV vs FRA CHARDY/MONFILS

Court 9: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Men's Singles First Round
ITA L. MUSETTI vs AUS J. MILLMAN


Women's Singles First Round
ESP P. BADOSA vs FRA K. MLADENOVIC


Women's Doubles First Round
ESP MUGURUZA/SUAREZ NAVARRO vs BEL MERTENS/VAN UYTVANCK

To Follow

Women's Singles First Round
ROU M. BUZARNESCU vs USA A. RISKE

Court 10: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Women's Singles First Round
COL MC. OSORIO SERRANO vs SUI V. GOLUBIC

To Follow

Men's Singles First Round
IND S. NAGAL vs UZB D. ISTOMIN


Men's Doubles First Round
ROC KHACHANOV/RUBLEV vs USA RAM/TIAFOE


Men's Doubles First Round
CRO MEKTIC/PAVIC vs BRA DEMOLINER/MELO

Court 11: Singles & Doubles First Round
22:00

Men's Doubles First Round
NED KOOLHOF/ROJER vs BEL GILLE/VLIEGEN


Women's Doubles First Round
TPE CHAN/CHAN vs ROU NICULESCU/OLARU

To Follow

Men's Doubles First Round
ARG MOLTENI/ZEBALLOS vs GBR MURRAY/SKUPSKI


Women's Doubles First Round
ROC KUDERMETOVA/VESNINA vs GER FRIEDSAM/SIEGEMUND

by ti-amie

by JazzNU
JTContinental wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 6:21 pm Veronica Cepede Royg inexplicably has been given a wild card for the third Olympics in a row.
I find nothing inexplicable about this one given all the Paraguayan Olympians we're all so familiar with. Got way more questions about the 10th or so highest ranked singles player from Australia making the cut. Her name being Sam Stosur doesn't change that she's currently in the neighborhood of 10th ranked and it's not due to injury.

by JazzNU
dmforever wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 6:28 pm I was going to ask how the selections were made. I know that a country can't have more than a certain number of singles players and doubles teams, and that rankings are involved as well, but after that, is is just up to someone to choose fairly randomly? Mohamed Safwat got in for Egypt too and his ranking is 171. Cool for Royg and Safwat, but I'm curious how that happens.

Kevin
From the ever helpful Wikipedia:

Verónica Cepede Royg secured the outright berth in the women's singles by winning the bronze medal at the 2019 Pan American Games in Lima, Peru, replacing the slot from the U.S. tennis player Caroline Dolehide.

Mohamed Safwat and Mayar Sherif secured an outright berth each in the men's and women's singles, respectively, by winning the gold medal at the 2019 African Games in Rabat, Morocco.

Full qualifying criteria up on Wiki. But again, no idea on how Stosur is in the field.

by ti-amie
JazzNU wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 7:45 pm
dmforever wrote: Thu Jul 22, 2021 6:28 pm I was going to ask how the selections were made. I know that a country can't have more than a certain number of singles players and doubles teams, and that rankings are involved as well, but after that, is is just up to someone to choose fairly randomly? Mohamed Safwat got in for Egypt too and his ranking is 171. Cool for Royg and Safwat, but I'm curious how that happens.

Kevin
From the ever helpful Wikipedia:

Verónica Cepede Royg secured the outright berth in the women's singles by winning the bronze medal at the 2019 Pan American Games in Lima, Peru, replacing the slot from the U.S. tennis player Caroline Dolehide.

Mohamed Safwat and Mayar Sherif secured an outright berth each in the men's and women's singles, respectively, by winning the gold medal at the 2019 African Games in Rabat, Morocco.

Full qualifying criteria up on Wiki. But again, no idea on how Stosur is in the field.
The others mentioned didn't give me pause. Stosur's participation does.

by skatingfan Stosur got the wildcard that was created for past Grand Slam Champions/Olympic Gold Medalists.

by Deuce ** Must remember not to open a topic without words typed in the 1st post **
:o :)

by ti-amie
Deuce wrote: Fri Jul 23, 2021 2:41 am ** Must remember not to open a topic without words typed in the 1st post **
:o :)
OOOPS I did it again...corrected.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie


by ti-amie @Tennis Watchers Guide for Olympic Tennis only

Image

by JazzNU I think Olympic Tennis is when I watch the least amount of tennis with all the other sports going on, most of which I only watch every 4 years.

by skatingfan
JazzNU wrote: Fri Jul 23, 2021 8:12 pm I think Olympic Tennis the when I watch the least amount of tennis with all the other sports going on, most of which I only watch every 4 years.
13 hour time difference between EDT & Tokyo doesn't help either. I will be following the results, but probably won't see many of the matches until the medal rounds. Watched rowing last night & tonight there's more rowing & men's gymnastics, and then swimming in the morning. One of the reasons that I like the Winter Olympics more than the Summer is that it's a lot easier to follow with fewer events & fewer sports.

by Suliso Doubt it will be possible for me to watch much tennis unless maybe someone from Switzerland gets close to medals.

by Deuce Leylah played a good 1st set, a mediocre 2nd set, and then dominated Yastremska 6-0 in the 3rd set to win the match. This despite becoming lost while going to the bathroom to change her clothes between the 2nd and 3rd sets, as it is very hot in Tokyo.

by Suliso Nothing special in singles so far, but a couple of big upsets in doubles. Chan sisters lost and Murray/Salisbury beat Mahut/Herbert.

by skatingfan
Suliso wrote: Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:20 am Nothing special in singles so far, but a couple of big upsets in doubles. Chan sisters lost and Murray/Salisbury beat Mahut/Herbert.
Andy Murray really does play some of his best tennis at the Olympics.

by patrick Two-time defending gold medalist champion for you.

by skatingfan Looks like Murray is out of men's singles event - replaced in the draw by Max Purcell of Australia.

by JTContinental Barty dumped in straight sets by Sorribes Tormo

Murray pulls out of singles with a quad injury, but will stay in the doubles draw

by Deuce ... And Purcell beat Felix in straight sets. After a good run at Wimbledon a couple of weeks ago, this was a disappointing, rather uninspired performance by Felix.
After an initial surge, his career has been one of two steps forward, two steps back. It seems that every time it appears that he has finally turned the corner and will now go on to win titles, he then goes on to lose a few matches one would think he'd win. It's still way too early to give up on the idea of him reaching his potential - he turns 21 in a couple of weeks (the same day that Federer turns 40)... but it is nonetheless frustrating to watch him hit highs inevitably followed by lows.

This leaves Leylah as the only remaining Canadian tennis player in the Olympics, as there were only 4 in total, and Dabrowski and Fichman lost their 1st round doubles match, as well.

Svitolina did her best to blow a 5-0 or 5-1 lead in the 3rd set over Siegemund, finally (and nervously) winning it 6-4.

by Suliso As far as women's tennis is concerned both Spain and Czech Republic went 6/6 in the first round.

by ashkor87 i have always been puzzled by the poor performance of great players and the great performance of mediocre players at the Olympics.. for instance, how on earth did Monica Puig win the gold last time? How is it Federer has won only a silver thus far, and Djokovic a bronze? (I am not even sure about that).. of course, I know, Serena, Murray and Nadal have done what we would expect of them..
if anyone has some explanations, I would want to hear them!

by ashkor87 As an Indian, I was delighted when Leander won the bronze but I still cannot believe how he did it.. what were all the other great players doing?!

by Suliso There are very few opportunities. Federer has played four Olympics and only one of them was in the year he finished #1. He did win gold in doubles with Wawrinka, though.

by Ribbons
ashkor87 wrote: Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:28 pm As an Indian, I was delighted when Leander won the bronze but I still cannot believe how he did it.. what were all the other great players doing?!
I couldn't resist looking this up. Apparently he was originally supposed to meet Sampras in the first round, but Sampras withdrew because of injury:

The list of seeds:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_at ... 7s_singles

ATP rankings/results in 1996:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_ATP_Tour

This article lists who else was missing: http://www.worldtennismagazine.com/archives/20108
LA Times goes into more detail: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm ... story.html
Stich and Becker were opposed to tennis being in the Olympics (in spite of being 1992 medalists). As for why Richie Regenberg (!) ended up being the #3 singles player for the US team -- and seeded! . . ..
If the U.S. Tennis Assn. were to nominate another singles player, it might be faced with slim pickings. Going down the rankings: No. 5 Michael Chang does not want to play, No. 9 Jim Courier was angry at being passed over the first time and may not be available, and the same is true of No. 16 Todd Martin. Martin, a Davis Cup loyalist, was offered a place on the Olympic team as a doubles player but refused.
I'm curious about why Chang didn't want to play, since he did join the team in 1992 and 2000, and 1996 he won tournaments in the US both before (DC) and after (LA) the Atlanta Games. I guess lack of prestige (aka other top players choosing to skip) and no ranking points on offer may have been enough for him to consider them not worth his while.

by Ribbons 1996 seems to have had quite a bit of drama across the board: apparently seeding on the ATP side for the US Open was problematic enough for Kafelnikov to bail and Muster to consider it:
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/08/25/spor ... -open.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_US_O ... 7s_Singles

I wasn't paying attention to tennis during this stretch, but now I might be curious enough to dive into some docs from the era.

[edited to clarify event with seeding shenanigans]

by ponchi101 1996 USO.
Sampras was #1. Agassi was to be seeded 8th, according to rankings. Kafelnikov 4. So, the USTA DECIDES (with a little nudge from Nike and NBC, who would show the SEMIS) to seed Agassi 4, so if he were to meet Sampras it would be on Super Saturday, and to place all the NON-SEEDS in the draw FIRST, then place the seeds. It was then that a lot of people found out about the Agassi/Kafelnikov switch. It was a mess. They re-did the draw, but it was so blatant to bring Agassi to 4th that a lot of players complained.
---0---
Why the odd Olympic results? The only thing that comes to mind is indeed that you are playing for your country. Financially or points-wise it makes little sense. So it is really just to play for your country. Ashley losing yesterday might have to do a lot with that. #1, on a favored surface, against a good but not great opponent. Wearing that Australia flag maybe truly affected her.
But I can't think of anything else.

by shmrck14
Suliso wrote: Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:07 am As far as women's tennis is concerned both Spain and Czech Republic went 6/6 in the first round.
I was thrilled to see that CSN won her match!

by jazzyg Chang once said he felt more Chinese than American because of the lukewarm reception he often received from American fans. Tbat may have played a factor, but the bigger one probably was his chase of the No. 1 world ranking, If Sampras had not saved a match point against Correjta on the way to the U.S. Open title, Chang would have been No. 1. He won the first set against Sampras in the final and took the second set to a tiebreak with another chance to become No. 1, but after losing the tiebreak, he looked defeated and went down meekly. He never reached No.1 in his career, but that summer was by far his best shot.

by Deuce After a rather one-sided 1st set, Leylah put up a good fight to come back in the 2nd set vs. Krejcikova - but the Czech was just too good in the end.

Singles and doubles are finished for Canada.
I think Gaby Dabrowski and Felix are playing Mixed Doubles together.

by ti-amie Paula Badosa defeated Iga Swiatek in straight sets. Iga sat on her bench crying for a good ten minutes or more. I wonder if she was allowed to bring her therapist. It was disturbing to watch. Not too much about it on TT though. Maybe people haven't seen the match yet. They literally had to send someone to tell her she had to leave the court so that they could set up for the next match.


by ti-amie Artur Gac
@arturgac
Tam siedzi Iga. Sama ze swoimi myślami. Odeszła od wszystkich. Serce aż pęka Broken heart #Tokio2020
@SportINTERIA
Translated from Polish by Google
Iga is sitting there. Alone with your thoughts. She walked away from everyone. The heart breaks Broken heart#Tokio2020
@SportINTERIA

Image

by JTContinental Sorry, meant this for the general olympics thread

by ponchi101 Wow about Iga. I guess it shows that this means a lot to many people.
She has had a rough last couple of months. That RG defeat, W wasn't that great, now this.
And the games are bringing out some very good tennis from some people. Sabalenka out to Vecic, Kvitova out to Van Uytvanck. I still say Naomi takes the gold, but silver and bronze are wide open.

by Suliso Petra was beaten by the heat. Sadly she has never learned to adapt to that...

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Mon Jul 26, 2021 6:39 pm Paula Badosa defeated Iga Swiatek in straight sets. Iga sat on her bench crying for a good ten minutes or more. I wonder if she was allowed to bring her therapist. It was disturbing to watch. Not too much about it on TT though. Maybe people haven't seen the match yet. They literally had to send someone to tell her she had to leave the court so that they could set up for the next match.
Interesting. I have a lot of thoughts about this, but I'll just say, this doesn't look good and I hope she's okay. And I also hope she doesn't rush back to play in a week or two and takes some time to regroup.

by Ribbons Donna Vekic was featured in a fluff NYT advertorial piece about athletes who like their watches:
Donna Vekic has won two Women’s Tennis Association singles titles and now is headed to Tokyo to represent Croatia at her first Olympics.

The 25-year-old grew up in Croatia in a family of professional athletes: Her father was a soccer player and her mother, a sprinter — even Grandma taught physical education.

At age 6, “I fell in love with tennis from the first practice,” Ms. Vekic said.

She now plays wearing a F.P. Journe Elegante Titanium Two Rows of Diamonds watch, a timepiece made by the Swiss independent François-Paul Journe (one of Ms. Vekic’s sponsors).

“I wear it a lot,” she said. “It’s light, it’s functional, and it’s very convenient. We have 25 seconds between points, so it’s good to keep an eye on the time.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/23/fash ... onman.html

by Fastbackss The empath in me hopes she gets the support she needs.

The realist in me wonders if this changes their considerations for Mixed Doubles (I presume they were qualified).

by ti-amie

by Omess
ti-amie wrote:Paula Badosa defeated Iga Swiatek in straight sets. Iga sat on her bench crying for a good ten minutes or more. I wonder if she was allowed to bring her therapist. It was disturbing to watch. Not too much about it on TT though. Maybe people haven't seen the match yet. They literally had to send someone to tell her she had to leave the court so that they could set up for the next match.

Yup the therapist is in Tokyo. IGA said earlier that winning a medal will be the highlight of her career so it explained her reaction a little


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

by JazzNU Naomi just lost to Vondrousova. Olympics man, strange results are always possible.

by jazzyg Osaka had nothing in her match against Vondrousova. Nothing.

it's understandable in her case since the tournament is in Japan, but any other player (besides Djokovic) who treats these Olympics as a huge event while playing in an empty stadium in a sport where the slams are far more significant than the Olympics is being self-delusional. I have zero sympathy for Swiatek if she felt this was a huge deal. It just isn't.

by jazzyg And while I''m on the negative kick, Rennae Stubbs, who has diarrhea of the mouth, just proved why she is my least favorite tennis announcer. She proclaimed confidently that Sakkari definitely will win a slam in the next year or two.

I like Sakkari's potential, and she certainly is capable of winning a slam, but that's simply an absurd statement on the current WTA. She'd never gone deep in any slam until Roland Garros, and with about 40 players capable of winning, the idea she's a sure thing in the next year or so is preposterous.

EDIT: and she just said she's never seen a player hit the ball as hard as Badosa. I don't even know where to go with that one.

by Deuce
jazzyg wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:06 am Osaka had nothing in her match against Vondrousova. Nothing.

it's understandable in her case since the tournament is in Japan, but any other player (besides Djokovic) who treats these Olympics as a huge event while playing in an empty stadium in a sport where the slams are far more significant than the Olympics is being self-delusional. I have zero sympathy for Swiatek if she felt this was a huge deal. It just isn't.
^ No-one but the individual in question can determine if the Olympics - or THIS Olympics - is meaningful or not.
If it's meaningful to the individual, then it's meaningful - period - regardless of anyone else's opinion or perspective.
I think it's wonderful that Swiatek was devastated at her loss. It shows she cares. It shows that this tournament is meaningful and important to her.
Athletes who give a damn are becoming fewer and fewer, as they play more and more for the paycheck and status than for the sheer joy of the competition and challenge. Jeez - if we can't appreciate - even admire - genuine passion and commitment in sports, then we're in big trouble.

EDIT: Typo - no 't' in 'status'.
jazzyg wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:32 am And while I''m on the negative kick, Rennae Stubbs, who has diarrhea of the mouth, just proved why she is my least favorite tennis announcer. She proclaimed confidently that Sakkari definitely will win a slam in the next year or two.

I like Sakkari's potential, and she certainly is capable of winning a slam, but that's simply an absurd statement on the current WTA. She'd never gone deep in any slam until Roland Garros, and with about 40 players capable of winning, the idea she's a sure thing in the next year or so is preposterous.

EDIT: and she just said she's never seen a player hit the ball as hard as Badosa. I don't even know where to go with that one.
^ I will agree with you about Stubbs, though. Not because of what she said about Sakkari - anyone can say such things, and it doesn't bother me... but because Stubbs has repeatedly demonstrated that she is an arrogant person who loves to simply hear herself talk (or 'tweet', or whatever).

by jazzyg Yes, I was just using Stubbs' comment about Sakkari as an example of her arrogance. If she didn't make statements similar to that one all of the time, I would not have brought it up.

by Suliso So much for Osaka easily winning this tournament... It is a very important tournament for a lot of players, particularly those from smaller countries.

by Suliso Now Muguruza the only GS champion left in women's singles draw. I still wouldn't call her a strong favorite.

by Fastbackss
Fastbackss wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 12:28 am The empath in me hopes she gets the support she needs.

The realist in me wonders if this changes their considerations for Mixed Doubles (I presume they were qualified).
Guess I just had to wait until this morning. She is paired with Kubot.

admit I am surprised to see Djokovic playing - but at most it's 4 matches, so...?

by Suliso On paper Sakkari/Tsitsipas is the strongest team.

by Fastbackss Will be interesting to see if any of the mixed teams pull out if the respective players are still active in other draws.

I am trying to find the list of alternates - oh, found it
https://opencourt.ca/2021/07/26/novak-d ... mpic-event

Kind of a bummer some of the more exciting alternates are further down...

by Suliso No way anyone would do that. This is Olympics not a Slam!!!

by ashkor87 Muguruza is the best player left, Bencic is the best on hard courts.. neither of which means much! i would love to see Giorgi win, but she has broken my heart (and others, too, I am sure) so many times, I dont dare to hope..my gut says Badosa will win. Let us see how that goes!

by martini4me
ashkor87 wrote: Sun Jul 25, 2021 2:28 pm As an Indian, I was delighted when Leander won the bronze but I still cannot believe how he did it.. what were all the other great players doing?!
The Tennis Podcast did a few "Olympics Relived" episodes during what would have been the Olympics last year. Paes was one of those featured. He said it was the highlight of his career, but that it was especially meaningful to him, as he was conceived at an Olympic Games. Yes, his parents were both athletes at the Munich games in 1972, where there was the terrorist attack on Israeli athletes. While the games were shut down for a few days, "there was nothing else for my parents to do", and Leander was the result.

by ponchi101
Suliso wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:52 am Now Muguruza the only GS champion left in women's singles draw. I still wouldn't call her a strong favorite.
Mugu will break out hearts like she does with frequency. She will reach the Semis, and then will lose her semi and her bronze medal match.
Badosa is looking solid.
I wonder if Naomi's mental approach is regressing. We can all remember how solid she looked in winning her last slam, specially in the semis against Serena. Now, anybody can lose to anybody in the WTA, but 1&4 against Vondrousova, who is not a marvel on hard courts, does not look good.

by JazzNU
ashkor87 wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:03 pm Muguruza is the best player left, Bencic is the best on hard courts. neither of which means much! i would love to see Giorgi win, but she has broken my heart (and others, too, I am sure) so many times, I dont dare to hope..my gut says Badosa will win. Let us see how that goes!
Very subjective to call Bencic left on hard courts. Svitolina is the most accomplished hard court player remaining in the draw.

by ponchi101 Mugu has one slam final on hards, has won Cincy. :)
The differences between the players left will be based on the quality of the breakfast they have the day they play.

by the Moz Not such a star or leader performance from Naomi., but there will be other Olympic opportunities for her in the future.

by JazzNU
Suliso wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:47 am On paper Sakkari/Tsitsipas is the strongest team.
I agree they appear to be a strong team and I'm not saying they don't have a good shot at a medal here, I can see it happening. But I think you're looking at this in terms of being a strong duo of singles players, right? But this is Mixed Doubles. I can't see the argument for any other team being stronger than France's Mladenovic/Mahut pairing, on paper or otherwise.

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 3:57 pm Mugu has one slam final on hards, has won Cincy. :)
The differences between the players left will be based on the quality of the breakfast they have the day they play.
And Elina has won multiple Premier titles on hard courts including Canada and also won the WTA Finals (and was the runner up another year).


The up and downs of your Garbine fandom are just odd @ponchi.

by ponchi101 How many emojis do I need to post when I am joking? ;)
My point was that there are no favorites anymore. The 8 players that you have left are as even as can be.

by Suliso
JazzNU wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 4:01 pm
I agree they appear to be a strong team and I'm not saying they don't have a good shot at a medal here, I can see it happening. But I think you're looking at this in terms of being a strong duo of singles players, right? But this is Mixed Doubles. I can't see the argument for any other team being stronger than France's Mladenovic/Mahut pairing, on paper or otherwise.
Correct, but quite often in Olympics singles players dominate doubles draws. Remember both Federer and Nadal have won gold in doubles and neither is particularly accomplished in doubles elsewhere.

by Suliso
JazzNU wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 3:52 pm
ashkor87 wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 2:03 pm Muguruza is the best player left, Bencic is the best on hard courts. neither of which means much! i would love to see Giorgi win, but she has broken my heart (and others, too, I am sure) so many times, I dont dare to hope..my gut says Badosa will win. Let us see how that goes!
Very subjective to call Bencic left on hard courts. Svitolina is the most accomplished hard court player remaining in the draw.
I wouldn't single out Bencic either, but to me Svitolina is always suspect. She doesn't have A+ level at all and someone might bring that to the final rounds. No idea who...

by JazzNU
Suliso wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:01 pm
I wouldn't single out Bencic either, but to me Svitolina is always suspect. She doesn't have A+ level at all and someone might bring that to the final rounds. No idea who...
Yeah, I thought she'd lose to Sakkari. And that's fine, I'm not talking about that. But for whatever reason, people on this forum like to pretend Svitolina is like a 30th ranked player hanging around for reasons unknown the way she is constantly dismissed from every conversation about winning something. Outside of maybe Kenin, it feels like y'all are willing to choose anyone else to win something over Elina. I'm not the biggest believer of Elina either, but I'm not pretending like she hasn't done a lot of winning in recent years, including some very big titles.

by JTContinental Maybe Camila Giorgi will like tennis more when she wins the gold medal

by skatingfan
Fastbackss wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:14 am Guess I just had to wait until this morning. She is paired with Kubot.

admit I am surprised to see Djokovic playing - but at most it's 4 matches, so...?
Novak usually plays men's doubles at the Olympics, but all his usual doubles partners have now retired.

by ashkor87
JazzNU wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:10 pm
Suliso wrote: Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:01 pm
I wouldn't single out Bencic either, but to me Svitolina is always suspect. She doesn't have A+ level at all and someone might bring that to the final rounds. No idea who...
Yeah, I thought she'd lose to Sakkari. And that's fine, I'm not talking about that. But for whatever reason, people on this forum like to pretend Svitolina is like a 30th ranked player hanging around for reasons unknown the way she is constantly dismissed from every conversation about winning something. Outside of maybe Kenin, it feels like y'all are willing to choose anyone else to win something over Elina. I'm not the biggest believer of Elina either, but I'm not pretending like she hasn't done a lot of winning in recent years, including some very big titles.
yes, of course, Svitolina has won some big ones, including the one in Singapore on a court and conditions very similar to Tokyo.. she has as good a chance as anyone but I would still bet on Bencic..

by Deuce Fognini - Medvedev was an interesting match, which is really no surprise.
Both looked completely exhausted at various stages - sometimes at the same time.
I was confident that Medvedev would win it (which he did), because, much like Djokovic, no matter how exhausted or injured he may (appear to) be, he has those extra gears he can engage when he needs to... and because I figured that it was inevitable that Fognini would fold and give up at some point.

by Suliso Belinda Bencic still in a position to be a double Olympic champion. :)

by the Moz C'mon BB :thumbsup:

by ashkor87 i am very interested to see what happens in the mixed doubles.. one school of thought has it that the team with the stronger player (read male) will win, theory of constraints says the team with the better weak link (read female) will win..! very few opportunities to test these theories of course because mixed is so rare - it is tactically so different from doubles, too - male or female.. very sorry to see Hopman cup die out..

by JazzNU



by JazzNU

by ponchi101 Why was it so important to play tennis at NOON, in an empty stadium? They have enough courts to play at night, and by now it was the QF's, so even fewer matches.
On other news, Garbie did not disappoint in disappointing :cry: 5 & 1, after cruising in her first three matches.

by JazzNU It seems they set the time ahead of this heat wave and didn't see fit to change it despite criticism since the beginning. Are there lights at the tennis center? Because it makes even less sense to not change it if they can play into the night.

I think it was Nastia who also said their ice packs were insufficient. Doesn't sound like they rival the Aussie ones, for instance, in terms of helping with cooling down quickly.

by ponchi101 The tennis center not only has lights, it has a retractable roof.
This time, it really looks like this was a case of "the timetable has been set and that is it". Somebody was truly stubborn, and athletes were not considered.
Time to make the Olympics the "Fall Games"? Paris in summer is pretty hot too. No need to run that show in a burning hell. The purpose of the games is not to see who can withstand the heat better.

by the Moz With a lot of decision making at these Games, the IOC and various sporting bodies are looking pretty tone deaf and stubbornly on the wrong side of common sense or what is right.

by Suliso Paris is nowhere near this hot during the summer. On average at least.

by ti-amie

by JazzNU
the Moz wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:12 pm With a lot of decision making at these Games, the IOC and various sporting bodies are looking pretty tone deaf and stubbornly on the wrong side of common sense or what is right.
Yeah, I've been wondering where ITF is on this issue. It seems like they could've advocated for the change to get it to happen. They have made schedule changes because of weather this Olympics (rowing because of the tsunami) so it would seem like it's possible, but there needs to be an advocate for safety I'd think. ITF should've been all over this from Day 1 when the players started complaining. It's not like the tennis center is being used for anything else, so shifting the schedule can't possibly be that big of an issue and there are plenty of other indoor sports that can fill in for missed pre-determined TV slots.

by skatingfan
ponchi101 wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:03 pm Time to make the Olympics the "Fall Games"? Paris in summer is pretty hot too. No need to run that show in a burning hell. The purpose of the games is not to see who can withstand the heat better.
That would interfere with the Football schedule.

by Suliso Not just football, every other major professional league as well.

by ti-amie

by Suliso Belinda in singles final :D

by Suliso Women's final is set now - Bencic vs Vondrousova. Not maybe the highest profile, but still very solid with two former and likely again future top 10 players. Hard to pick between these two, only one h2h meeting.

by Suliso Medvedev has been vanquished, but there will be one serious test for Nole after all. In semi finals vs Zverev.

by Suliso Bencic will go for double gold (probably Djokovic too). I think chances much higher in singles.

by ponchi101 Djokovic's 2 & 0 over Kei is pretty impressive. I know Kei is not the same player as before, bit that score is extreme.
I remember a few years ago, in TAT1.0, with Drop and I talking about Novak and his performance. We were saying "how do you stop this?". A fellow member interrupted us and said that we were suffering from "what I am seeing now is the greatest" syndrome. Drop and I agreed that we were perhaps under that spell.
A few years later, I wonder if we were not. How do you really stop this guy? Zverev is going to have to serve at 90% to have a chance.

On the womens: GO Belinda! It would be good to see her win. (Nothing against Marketa)

by Suliso It seems unlikely he'll manage it here, but he has beaten Djokovic twice. Last time being 2018 WTF finals on indoor hard.

by skatingfan
Suliso wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:39 pm Not just football, every other major professional league as well.
But football is the one that would affect NBC the most.

by ponchi101
skatingfan wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 5:10 pm
Suliso wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 8:39 pm Not just football, every other major professional league as well.
But football is the one that would affect NBC the most.
I think you two are talking about TWO different footballs ;)
(Suliso, I think, is talking the European Soccer Leagues. Skating is talking NFL, I guess? :?: )

by ponchi101
Suliso wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 4:22 pm It seems unlikely he'll manage it here, but he has beaten Djokovic twice. Last time being 2018 WTF finals on indoor hard.
Totally. Is it 100% out of the question? No. Play the match. But he is truly looking very hard to beat.

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 4:07 pm Djokovic's 2 & 0 over Kei is pretty impressive. I know Kei is not the same player as before, bit that score is extreme.
I remember a few years ago, in TAT1.0, with Drop and I talking about Novak and his performance. We were saying "how do you stop this?". A fellow member interrupted us and said that we were suffering from "what I am seeing now is the greatest" syndrome. Drop and I agreed that we were perhaps under that spell.
A few years later, I wonder if we were not. How do you really stop this guy? Zverev is going to have to serve at 90% to have a chance.
I think the other member is right. If Andy's body wasn't failing him for the last few years, I don't think you would be asking that question as much. You would at times, but not so long ago, Novak wasn't just winning everything. But his toughest competition is aging or injured. Kei can be included in that since we can probably all remember what a healthy Kei looked like against Novak. And remember, both Kei and Del Potro are younger than Novak too. Even Dominic Thiem, who seems to be getting forgotten by people on this forum for reasons unknown, is a tough out for Novak on hard courts not just on clay. Novak is playing great, but his greatness is somewhat amplified right now because of who is missing.

by ti-amie Svitolina jinxed herself. She said for Ukraine the Olympics is like a Slam.

by Suliso Not like she's doing so amazing in Slams either. See my comment few days ago about her not having A+ game at all. I still stand by that assessment.

by JazzNU
Suliso wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:35 pm Not like she's doing so amazing in Slams either. See my comment few days ago about her not having A+ game at all. I still stand by that assessment.

Image

by ponchi101
JazzNU wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:43 pm ...

I think the other member is right. If Andy's body wasn't failing him for the last few years, I don't think you would be asking that question as much. You would at times, but not so long ago, Novak wasn't just winning everything. But his toughest competition is aging or injured. Kei can be included in that since we can probably all remember what a healthy Kei looked like against Novak. And remember, both Kei and Del Potro are younger than Novak too. Even Dominic Thiem, who seems to be getting forgotten by people on this forum for reasons unknown, is a tough out for Novak on hard courts not just on clay. Novak is playing great, but his greatness is somewhat amplified right now because of who is missing.
The man has won three slams this year, and the reason is because who is missing?

Thiem. The man has not played in months. Hard to keep him in mind.
And as the person that posted his LEFT HANDED video, I have not forgotten him. But not much to talk about him lately, other than in the injury topic.

by the Moz Very happy for Belinda! Now bring home the Gold please :)

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:46 pm The man has won three slams this year, and the reason is because who is missing?

Thiem. The man has not played in months. Hard to keep him in mind.
And as the person that posted his LEFT HANDED video, I have not forgotten him. But not much to talk about him lately, other than in the injury topic.
No it's not the reason, it's a contributing factor. I think how you're thinking about him right now, his dominance, is in part because of who is missing.

In terms of Thiem, I'm was especially talking about the Olympics and this format. A healthy Andy is obviously capable of beating Novak. Delpo beat him at the last Olympics and is missing right now. Thiem beat Djokovic in the last two ATP Finals in the 3-set format on hard courts. And yes, he's injured right now, that's the point.

I don't remember you saying this in 2016, and take away Federer and Nadal, the competition that was expected to be with him, that is his age or younger, is down and out due to injury these days or greatly hampered by repeated injuries and that's my point. Add them back and is he winning at the same level he is right now? Doubtful. Winning a lot? Sure, he's done that his entire career. But not getting challenged wasn't the norm for him and I doubt it would be now.

by Deuce Come on... let's be real here... Are we really going to diminish Djokovic's accomplishments based on 'what ifs'?
Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer have all played in an Era where they have had to face each other. That's 60 Majors bewtween them. This is absolutely unprecedented. Everyone said that Sampras was one of the greatest because he beat Emerson's record of winning 12 Majors. But Sampras wasn't playing against others who won as many Majors as him - let alone 2 others.

Also, if you look at the Major winners over the past 50 years or so, probably at least half of them were won having a legitimate contender out of the tournament (either losing early, or not playing due to injury).
So to diminish Djokovic's accomplishments because, say, Thiem and Del Potro have been injured is not at all fair to Djokovic. Every champion went through something similar. Are we then to put asterisks beside them all? Seriously?

Again, Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer have won 20 Majors each WHILE HAVING TO PLAY EACH OTHER throughout that time. Twenty years ago, if someone would have proposed that this was going to happen - with ANY 3 players - they'd have been laughed off of the planet. That's how impressive this feat is - for each of them.

And I'm saying this as one who is not a Djokovic fan - I don't like his playing style or his personality. But I certainly won't deny him his accomplishments, or the credit and admiration he is due.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by Deuce Khachanov in a fairly routine straight sets over Carreno Busta.

After a quick and very one-sided 1st set (6-1 Djokovic), Zverev put together a mini streak of 9 straight points and 12 of 13 toward the end of the 2nd set to take it 6-3, making the match suddenly both interesting and entertaining.
Zverev broke to open the 3rd. Then held. Then broke again. Then held again. He's won 8 straight games now - 4-0 in the 3rd.
Djokovic is not looking like his usual immortal self. Chinks are showing in the armour - many uncharacteristic mistakes. In the past, he has reached down and found ways to win even when it looked certain that he'd lose. Can he do it again here?
Can Zverev maintain this pace and not choke?

I wouldn't count Djokovic out, even at this point.

by Deuce Well... No 'Golden Slam' this year. 6-1 Zverev in the 3rd.

Zverev played really well from about the midway point of the 2nd set to the end. But he was helped greatly by Djokovic, who very simply - and very uncharacteristically - vanished.

by Suliso I have Zverev winning the title in predictions. :)

by ponchi101 You are some sort of genius... ;)
It is a strange dynamic. He is still very dominant at Slams, and not so at regular tour events. And of course, the difference is the best of 5 format, and the in-between day of rest.
So it seems him and Roger will have that NO OLYMPIC GOLD hole in their resume, as Rafa will most likely have his NO YEAR END CHAMPIONSHIPS. I don't know if the three years until Paris 2024, on clay, will take away from him. Then again, by now I don't bet against anything the big three can do.

by Suliso Actually Roger does have Olympic gold. Sure, it's in doubles but Olympic gold nonetheless. That's why top singles players take Olympic doubles more seriously than they would in a Slam.

by ti-amie

by mmmm8 And an all-Russian final in the Mixed :)

(Who has Elena Vesnina and Aslan Karatsev beat Novak Djokovic for an Olympic medal in their January 2020 season predictions? 😀)

by dmforever Who y'all picking for the women's and men's singles final? I'm going to say Vondrousova and Kachanov for the gold, and Rybakina and Nole, though I think there is a strong chance that CB might win.

Kevin

by Suliso I'll go opposite - Bencic and Zverev.

by ponchi101 I say the opposite. Belinda and Zverev. He played a gorgeous third set against Novak.

by dmforever
ponchi101 wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 3:16 am I say the opposite. Belinda and Zverev. He played a gorgeous third set against Novak.
I actually just picked who i wanted to win because I have a horrible record of predicting matches, so why pretend otherwise. :) Also, I didn't see Zverev, but I did see Khachanov's match and I was super impressed.

Kevin

by mick1303
Deuce wrote: Fri Jul 30, 2021 9:57 am Well... No 'Golden Slam' this year. 6-1 Zverev in the 3rd.

Zverev played really well from about the midway point of the 2nd set to the end. But he was helped greatly by Djokovic, who very simply - and very uncharacteristically - vanished.
There was a moment in the 2nd set in the game when Zverev got broken. He thought that the ball was long and was mad with himself that he didn't stop the play. So he continued to harp on this and muttered wandering around the baseline. At this point Djokovic said something. I did not decipher what exactly did he say, but it was a mistake to open his mouth then. Because it transformed Zverev to a beast, who could hardly miss. It was a decimation that reminded of Safin's 2000 USO final against Sampras.

by Fastbackss I was talking to a friend of mine on Thursday (also a tennis player) that has too been watching a lot of the Olympics.

Neither one of us had found a single tennis point.

I am visiting my mom today and find the women's final. Sweet. Took me a minute to realise it's on the Olympic Channel. That explains why I haven't seen any if it's been on that all along.

by mmmm8 Djokovic and Stojanovic withdrew from the Mixed Bronze medal match after Djokovic lost the singles bronze. Official reason is Djokovic shoulder injury.

Not a good look and really sucks for Stojanovic's probably only shot at the history books.

by mmmm8 Laura Pigossi of Brazil and Luisa Stefani of Brazil won the women's Bronze. I've never even heard of Luisa Stefani!

by JazzNU Fantastic place to break the losing streak. Congrats PCB!






by JazzNU How nice for Elina and Ukraine! Congrats.









by JazzNU



by mmmm8 Djokovic's W/O means Ashleigh Barty (and John Peers) get a medal, btw.

Could have seen men's vs women's No. 1 competing!

by JazzNU In case you missed it, this happened during the Bronze Medal Match.



by JazzNU Not happy with Belinda winning. Would've been happy. But then the obvious coaching during the match. And then the thing that was the worst, calling the tactical MTO before Marketa's serve, and it was the game to set her up to serve for the match. It worked. I'm not surprised by any of it from her, seen it before, but it feels worse at the Olympics to me. Feel bad for Marketa, even though I'm very neutral on her as a player in general.

by Suliso I think I'm happy about Belinda winning anyway. :)

by JazzNU

by Suliso Olympics clearly meant a lot for Bencic. She has a chance of another gold, albeit I think much less likely than in singles.

by ponchi101 I guess the umpire accepted that Novak throwing his racquet into the stands was simply part of the Olympic spirit. In a sense, he did not abused it, he simply sent it packing.
I was unable to finish the match, as it was 03:00 here. Saw the first two sets; I thought that after PCB won the first, Novak would pack it, but of course he did not. Good for him.
He says he suffered an injury and therefore could not compete in the Mixed Doubles. Let's see how it affects it for the upcoming hard court season.
And although I like that Belinda won, the MTO thing has to be regulated. That was tactical, and it was excessive. I think the best solution is what we have said here: you want a MTO in the middle of the set? It costs you 1 point per every 5 minutes of MTO, starting at 0.

by dmforever I'm the biggest Nole fan here I think, but honestly, the racket throwing and net bashing is pathetic. And did he really get injured? If not, he's just amazingly selfish. Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm not a huge sports fan in general and haven't been watching any of the other Olympic events, but I can't remember athletes in other disciplines throwing equipment or fits when they lose. It seems like the Olympic spirit is lost on Djokovic (and Bencic as well, given her MTO).

Kevin

by ashkor87
ashkor87 wrote: Wed Jul 28, 2021 11:29 am i am very interested to see what happens in the mixed doubles.. one school of thought has it that the team with the stronger player (read male) will win, theory of constraints says the team with the better weak link (read female) will win..! very few opportunities to test these theories of course because mixed is so rare - it is tactically so different from doubles, too - male or female.. very sorry to see Hopman cup die out..
so now Vesnina and Karatsev should beat Rublev and Pavlyuchenkova, if the theory is right - Vesnina is surely a better doubles player than Pavly..

by ponchi101
dmforever wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:44 pm I'm the biggest Nole fan here I think, but honestly, the racket throwing and net bashing is pathetic. And did he really get injured? If not, he's just amazingly selfish. Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm not a huge sports fan in general and haven't been watching any of the other Olympic events, but I can't remember athletes in other disciplines throwing equipment or fits when they lose. It seems like the Olympic spirit is lost on Djokovic (and Bencic as well, given her MTO).

Kevin
Tears and crying I have seen a lot, at the Olympics. Both joy and sadness, so your point about the racquet bashing may be right. Then again, ours is one of the few sports in which you keep the equipment after the point, so other athletes may express their frustration in other ways.
The injury, as reported, is to the shoulder. I did not see any diminished power on his serve, and he actually saved a MP in the second set with a wickedly angled serve out wide, and a solid volley. I actually think he served and volleyed way more than usual.
For Nole, this is menial. He will be back on court soon, winning a lot more. But for his partner, an Olympic Bronze would have been a career pinnacle. So not taking the court must have been a bummer for her, to say the least.

by ti-amie Sometimes you need to visit other fan sites to appreciate this site. I had to come here to find out what happened during the matches played today because every other site seems to be composed of a bunch of juveniles flaming each other.

Thanks for the information everyone.

by ti-amie I'm not surprised at all about Bencic being walked through her match. It happens all the time with her and if it's not allowed she collapses in tears.

I feel bad for Stojanovic.

Congrats to Elina Svitolina.

Very happy that PCB finally showcased his best tennis here.

by mmmm8 I don't know... I think you use the tools available to you... as long as that MTO option is available to both players and the injury is not entirely made up (she had a blister), the strategic timing of the timeout is fair game, even if not great sportsmanship. This should be regulated better, but I don't blame Bencic.

I feel stronger about the coaching. I didn't think it was THAT egregious from Belinda in this particular match, at least from what I saw, but it's still problematic.

by ti-amie
mmmm8 wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:27 pm I don't know... I think you use the tools available to you... as long as that MTO option is available to both players and the injury is not entirely made up (she had a blister), the strategic timing of the timeout is fair game, even if not great sportsmanship. This should be regulated better, but I don't blame Bencic.

I feel stronger about the coaching. I didn't think it was THAT egregious from Belinda in this particular match, at least from what I saw, but it's still problematic.
What Carlos Rodriguez was to Henin Bencic's father was to her. I guess she's found someone to take his place?

by mmmm8
ti-amie wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:37 pm
mmmm8 wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:27 pm I don't know... I think you use the tools available to you... as long as that MTO option is available to both players and the injury is not entirely made up (she had a blister), the strategic timing of the timeout is fair game, even if not great sportsmanship. This should be regulated better, but I don't blame Bencic.

I feel stronger about the coaching. I didn't think it was THAT egregious from Belinda in this particular match, at least from what I saw, but it's still problematic.

What Carlos Rodriguez was to Henin Bencic's father was to her. I guess she's found someone to take his place?
I think her dad was there.

by JazzNU Egregious? Maybe not. But definitely getting coached in that final set when she was struggling at a few points. She was getting frustrated and who knows what happens if she's not aided in those moments, she's spun out with lesser stakes when frustrated. Marketa heard all of it and was none too happy that Belinda was getting an assist. Marketa straight stared down the Swiss box a few times.

by ponchi101 To me, it goes deeper than the coaching, or MTO's, or racquet bashing. It is either tennis enforces the rules, or get rid of them.
I think players should have some sort of conference and decide how they are going to behave, as a whole.
(Ah, ponchi101's, summer day dream. About time).

by JazzNU As for Djokovic. I'm an idiot because how many times does he have to do these things where I'm not shocked. But had you asked me if I thought it was likely he'd have a blowup at the Olympics, I'd have said, it will not happen. He knows all eyes are on him AND he's representing his beloved country, he will not tarnish that or the Olympics. At anything on tour or a grand slam? No shock in those venues, but I would've bet money he wouldn't make a headline of this variety here. And yet here we are. This was predictable and yet I truly thought he wouldn't go there at this particular event given it's importance and reach, that the statesman would know better. So many more people than typically would are seeing this, it's such a bad look.

by dmforever
ponchi101 wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:38 pm
dmforever wrote: Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:44 pm I'm the biggest Nole fan here I think, but honestly, the racket throwing and net bashing is pathetic. And did he really get injured? If not, he's just amazingly selfish. Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm not a huge sports fan in general and haven't been watching any of the other Olympic events, but I can't remember athletes in other disciplines throwing equipment or fits when they lose. It seems like the Olympic spirit is lost on Djokovic (and Bencic as well, given her MTO).

Kevin
Tears and crying I have seen a lot, at the Olympics. Both joy and sadness, so your point about the racquet bashing may be right. Then again, ours is one of the few sports in which you keep the equipment after the point, so other athletes may express their frustration in other ways.
The injury, as reported, is to the shoulder. I did not see any diminished power on his serve, and he actually saved a MP in the second set with a wickedly angled serve out wide, and a solid volley. I actually think he served and volleyed way more than usual.
For Nole, this is menial. He will be back on court soon, winning a lot more. But for his partner, an Olympic Bronze would have been a career pinnacle. So not taking the court must have been a bummer for her, to say the least.
I completely agree about his mixed partner. She has the right to be really upset. And yes, you are right about equipment, but there are always towels, goggles, baseball bats, bows, or javelins to chuck. :)

I also agree that it's mental with Novak. However, I'm less sure about a bounce back, at least in time for the US Open. Remember when he finally completed his career slam at RG? Right after that was when he went away for 2 years (went away for him, anyway). Perhaps this time he'll know that he can't go away and still break records because time is not on his side anymore. But that fact might also contribute to him having problems closing out matches and tournaments.

And still, adjectives like petulant, spoiled, bratty, and privileged are what come to mind when I think of him now. Too bad. :(

Kevin

by ti-amie

by Deuce Firstly... I don't have - and have never had - any problem at all with any player throwing/smashing his/her racquet. The reason I have no problem at all with it is that it is a release of pent-up frustration and anger, and demonstrates that the player cares and is intensely committed to doing his/her best.
Please don't twist my meaning... I am NOT saying that players who don't throw their racquets don't care, or that throwing the racquet is the only way to show that one cares. I am saying that throwing one's racquet is, to me, a very obvious sign that the player gives a damn. And to me, that's a very good thing. Much better than a playing being indifferent about playing poorly, or about winning or losing.
I have much more of a problem with players who treat the umpire as a fool, insulting him/her, etc. The way I see it, players make many errors in every match; umpires/linespeople make far fewer errors than the players do. So the players are really in no position to complain about the possible odd mistake from umpires/linespeople.

Secondly... That said, I don't think Djokovic really cared much about winning the bronze in Singles. He obviously did not care about winning the bronze in Mixed Doubles... but, I think, after losing the Semi, the Singles tournament was over for him emotionally. I think his frustration in throwing/smashing his racquet was, more than anything, because he was upset at himself for not caring.

Thirdly... Rybakina had ample opportunities to win the bronze in that match vs. Svitoina. And she blew them all. It was like she literally forgot how to play the game. This was the very definition of Choking - with a capital 'C'.

Lastly... I did not see the women's Singles gold medal match. But, as I've said countless times before: The coaching problem in the women's game will absolutely remain as long as the powers that be sit on the fence about the issue of coaching. By allowing coaching from the seats in most tournaments, but not allowing it in Majors, they are sending an incredibly loud mixed message to all the players and coaches. It's stupid, plain and simple. And it will continue to result in the mess we see now.
Either allow it or don't allow it - period. This 'hybrid approach' could not be more asinine.
While on the subject of coaching, I've long said that coaching should be permitted without any restrictions (apart from the time clock) in Junior tennis. This way, the kids will learn what is the best strategy to employ in given situations. With this help, they would be far more self-sufficient and self-reliant when they become adults and turn pro.

As for Belinda's medical time-out... I didn't see the match, and so, not knowing the exact 'vibe' of the match at that point, I won't comment. I did see this, though...

Bencic Wins Gold Amid Controversial MTO

.

by Suliso To the surprise of no one Krejcikova/Siniakova wins women's doubles gold.

Belinda Bencic the only one with two medals in these Olympics.

by the Moz Hooray BB :thumbsup:

by Fastbackss The mixed finals was really entertaining. 2nd set TB led directly to a super tiebreak.

High quality play and shot making. Wish we got to see more mixed coverage other than the finals at most slams

by JazzNU I only saw the super tiebreak, but based on that, they don't win if Nastia isn't on that team. Rublev was almost a liability in the tiebreak, so I'm glad he got match point. I really thought the win had slipped away from them.

by ponchi101 I could not stay up for the Gold match for the men's, but the score seems pretty humdrum. Was Zverev still on, as he was in the semis? Or did Khachanov come down?
Good games, I guess. Too many big names missing, but the people that went delivered.

by dmforever And there is this:




IF you don't have FB or can't see the link, I've included the text below. It has a picture of Novak when he was smashing his racket and the ball person was cringing away from him.

The writer Marlon James prefaced repost with the line **&% ^&$% hypocrite and I have to agree. I hadn't heard his remark about Biles.

Thursday: When asked about Biles, Novak Djokovic replied: ‘Pressure is a privilege..If you are aiming to be at the top of the game you better start learning how to deal with pressure and how to cope with those moments....'

Saturday: Novak Djokovic lost his cool, threw a racket over 5 rows of seats, broke another racket and threw it in the photographers pit, faked an injury & withdrew from his bronze medal mixed match because he couldn’t handle the pressure.


Kevin

by ponchi101 I'll write something else about Biles, but about Novak, his retirement from the Bronze is what I thinks tells us the kind of person that he is. I said it before; for him, that means little. But for his partner, it would have meant so much more.
If you don't like playing in teams, that is fine. That is the reason you play tennis, as individual a sport as it can be. But once you enter a teams event, you also owe something to your partner and teammates. Otherwise, just don't do it.

by Suliso Indeed, yet another indication why he has never been as popular as Federer or Nadal. GOAT or no GOAT.

by the Moz Tennis shouldn't be in the Olympics, or if it is the athletes should be amateurs, not entitled and overpaid professionals

by Suliso
the Moz wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:03 pm Tennis shouldn't be in the Olympics, or if it is the athletes should be amateurs, not entitled and overpaid professionals
You've got to be kidding. 70-80% of all Olympic athletes are full time professionals. From countries like mine closer to 90%. Whether they earn 25k or 25 million is a secondary question.

by the Moz
Suliso wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:27 pm
the Moz wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:03 pm Tennis shouldn't be in the Olympics, or if it is the athletes should be amateurs, not entitled and overpaid professionals
You've got to be kidding. 70-80% of all Olympic athletes are full time professionals. From countries like mine closer to 90%. Whether they earn 25k or 25 million is a secondary question.
Nope. Just my opinion.

In a perfect world the Olympics should feature amateur athletes only. Alas, we do not live in a perfect world.

by ti-amie


by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

Aslan really curbing his enthusiasm...

by JTContinental Reading today Novak used the non-excuse of “I wish I could help myself, but that’s just who I am.”

by JazzNU
JTContinental wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:58 pm Reading today Novak used the non-excuse of “I wish I could help myself, but that’s just who I am.”
Indeed he did.

"It's part of, I guess, who I am,'' Djokovic said. "I don't like doing these things. I'm sorry for sending this kind of message, but we're all human beings and sometimes it's difficult to control your emotions.''



https://www.espn.com/olympics/story/_/i ... ws-racquet

by ponchi101 And I liked this part too:
"I'm sorry to Nina for not being able to play, but my body just gave up,'' Djokovic said, adding that he has "several'' injuries. "I played under medicines, unbelievable pain and exhaustion.''

So, he won the Aussie after he was nearly forced to retire due to is chest/abdominal injury, and here he was also in deep pain, after cruising in his first four matches and winning Wimbledon, his most recent tournament, with ease.

I want a proper definition of "unbelievable pain".

by ti-amie

by Deuce
the Moz wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:59 pm
Suliso wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:27 pm
the Moz wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 5:03 pm Tennis shouldn't be in the Olympics, or if it is the athletes should be amateurs, not entitled and overpaid professionals
You've got to be kidding. 70-80% of all Olympic athletes are full time professionals. From countries like mine closer to 90%. Whether they earn 25k or 25 million is a secondary question.
Nope. Just my opinion.

In a perfect world the Olympics should feature amateur athletes only. Alas, we do not live in a perfect world.
^ As mentioned, it's not just in tennis where very rich professional athletes are competing in the Olympics - such is the case in many (a growing number) of sports.
As I recall, there was years long debate about whether NHL hockey players should be playing in the Olympics (before they were permitted to play in the Olympics). One side of the argument was that, if the Olympics are meant to be the pinnacle of sport, the best players in the world should be participating.
The other side of the argument was that the Olympics were designed to be the pinnacle of AMATEUR sport, and so should be restricted to amateur participants, excluding professionals.

Of course, there is far more professional sport now than when the Olympics were created. Back then, pretty much everything was an amateur sport. More recently, the powers that be (which never includes selfless people working for the greater good) decided that there is a huge sum of money to be made from professionals participating in the Olympics - and so the floodgates were opened.
As well, the line between amateur sport and professional sport has been getting more and more blurry every year.

A very valid argument can certainly be made that professional sports already get many opportunities for exposure (which is why there's an obscene amount of money in pro sports)... and so to give them even more of the spotlight in the Olympics is massive overkill - when the Olympics could be a stage to give amateur sports the recognition they deserve, and so rarely receive.

by ponchi101 I remember all those amateur Soviet, East German, Chinese and Cuban athletes racking up medals, because the athletes from the other countries had bills to pay and jobs to pay those bills, while the amateurs did nothing but train as state sponsored workers.
I am that old.

by mick1303
ponchi101 wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:08 pm And I liked this part too:
"I'm sorry to Nina for not being able to play, but my body just gave up,'' Djokovic said, adding that he has "several'' injuries. "I played under medicines, unbelievable pain and exhaustion.''

So, he won the Aussie after he was nearly forced to retire due to is chest/abdominal injury, and here he was also in deep pain, after cruising in his first four matches and winning Wimbledon, his most recent tournament, with ease.

I want a proper definition of "unbelievable pain".
I like Novak "on-court" persona. I like how he fights (in most cases). But his behavior here was utterly disappointing... And I'm afraid that it might return and bite him in his behind in US Open.

In a hindsight, he probably should've ignored those journo-woodpeckers, who were repeating "Steffi, Steffi" and skipped this Olympics. What Steffi done in 88 is in no way comparable, because WTA Grand Slams are way watered down due to best of three format.

by ashkor87 apropos nothing, i wonder if the bronze medal should be called the brass medal.. it is closer to brass than bronze - bronze has tin.. the medal contains zinc, which is what brass is made of (along with copper)..'brass medal' doesnt sound as good, though, sounds a bit brassy..

by dmforever
ashkor87 wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 2:15 pm apropos nothing, i wonder if the bronze medal should be called the brass medal.. it is closer to brass than bronze - bronze has tin.. the medal contains zinc, which is what brass is made of (along with copper)..'brass medal' doesnt sound as good, though, sounds a bit brassy..
Do the names of the medals refer to the metallic content of the medals or the color? I always thought it was the latter. Are the gold medals made of gold? They're pretty valuable if they are. Ditto the silver medals.

Kevin

by Suliso In the past silver was from silver and gold was gold plated silver. Now they might have come up with something more funny

by ponchi101 From the web:
Are the Olympic Gold medals made from pure gold?
For each Olympic event, the medals are made differently as host countries produce them prior to the events with unique designs.
The Olympic medals stopped being made of pure gold in 1912 and are instead made of six grams of gold plating while the rest of it is pure silver.
The silver medals are made entirely of pure silver, while the bronze medals are made of red brass, 95% copper and 5% zinc.
The gold medals are worth only around $800 if melted down due to the gold-plating surrounding it.

by mmmm8 I think this year's medals are made from recycled electronics.

by Suliso You'd be better off with Nobel prize medal. I believe that one still pure gold.

by ponchi101 I remembered something else last night, regarding Amateurs in the Olympics.
Athletes like Yulimar Rojas or Catherine Ibarguen could not be Olympians if they were amateurs. Venezuela and Colombia simply cannot afford to help them, if they were simply amateurs. Rojas trains in Guadalajara, Spain, and as talented as she is, in Venezuela there are no facilities nor support personnel that could have made that medal possible.
Poor countries would be relegated to boxing, long distance running and a few other sports. Everything else today needs way too much dedication to have a 9 to 5 to deal with too.

by ponchi101
Suliso wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:52 pm You'd be better off with Nobel prize medal. I believe that one still pure gold.
They are. Plus the prize.

by Suliso
ponchi101 wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:56 pm I remembered something else last night, regarding Amateurs in the Olympics.
Athletes like Yulimar Rojas or Catherine Ibarguen could not be Olympians if they were amateurs. Venezuela and Colombia simply cannot afford to help them, if they were simply amateurs. Rojas trains in Guadalajara, Spain, and as talented as she is, in Venezuela there are no facilities nor support personnel that could have made that medal possible.
Poor countries would be relegated to boxing, long distance running and a few other sports. Everything else today needs way too much dedication to have a 9 to 5 to deal with too.
All that amateur thing was an invention of late 19th century gentlemen. That way sport would be kept as a noble pursuit of middle and upper classes.

Soccer started out as a game of lower classes hence it became professional very quickly. Rugby was a favorite of British upper classes and therefore it became fully professional only relatively recently.

by dmforever I somehow missed this. He's such a jerk. I will not be sorry when he retires, which will hopefully be soon.

https://www.out.com/sports/2021/7/29/ol ... lames-heat

It's not about offending people's sensibilities, Fabio. When you "apologize" like that, it's not really an apology. It's subtle, but his fauxpology made it about the other people and how sensitive they are. When you apologize, the focus should only be on yourself and what you did.

If you know Italian, you can read the article here to see exactly what he said. If you don''t, he said the equivalent of the "f" word, which, coincidentally, is also an "f" word in Italian.

https://www.lastampa.it/sport/2021/07/2 ... 1.40549382


And I know I've posted about him before, but he really pisses me off, so please indulge me. Years ago he also posted a video to his social media using the same word.

Kevin