Page 14 of 17

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:56 am
by ponchi101
If the reason why the top players reach that status is because of the size of the entourage, that will only mean a widening gap at the top.
I am sure not every player can have a 5-member team. By Novak's logic, those players are playing at a disadvantage.

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:09 pm
by meganfernandez
I interviewed Ben for a friend's media podcast. Took place before the AO, fwiw.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/b ... 0642871165

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 7:01 am
by 3mlm
I'm not sure this is journalism but I was on the ATP website and clicked on Hurkacz' name to pull up his page on the site and the picture on the overview page was not Hurkacz but Zverev, the same one as on the Zverev overview page.

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 11:03 am
by ashkor87
Just checked..you are right..!

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2024 6:59 pm
by ti-amie
And tennis fans drag the WTA site...

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2024 5:07 pm
by meganfernandez
3mlm wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2024 7:01 am I'm not sure this is journalism but I was on the ATP website and clicked on Hurkacz' name to pull up his page on the site and the picture on the overview page was not Hurkacz but Zverev, the same one as on the Zverev overview page.
I think it's fixed now... of all people to be mistaken for. Yeesh.

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:54 pm
by ashkor87
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/su ... ells-miami
A puerile conversation! Which player wouldn't want to do well in the Sunshine double? Beats me that anyone even thinks it is a question...

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:55 pm
by ashkor87
Meanwhile, there is a story about Pegula/Kostyuk and the picture is of Boulter.
https://www.wtatennis.com/news/3920217/ ... iego-final

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:27 pm
by ponchi101
Indeed, but Boulter is mentioned all over the article. And you have to admit Boulter is a bit of eye candy.

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 6:47 pm
by Suliso
Is she still dating de Minaur?

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:46 pm
by ti-amie
ashkor87 wrote: Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:54 pm https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/su ... ells-miami
A puerile conversation! Which player wouldn't want to do well in the Sunshine double? Beats me that anyone even thinks it is a question...
"Is Alcaraz at a career crossroads?"

I stopped right there.

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:54 pm
by ponchi101
Yes. After all, we know he is finished. I am just letting Nelslus start the "Carlitos is washed up" topic.
What a silly question.

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2024 3:14 am
by ashkor87
ponchi101 wrote: Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:27 pm Indeed, but Boulter is mentioned all over the article. And you have to admit Boulter is a bit of eye candy.
So is Kostyuk ..I actually tried the experiment..showed the article to my wife, who knows tennis but is not a junkie like me - asked her lwhose pic that must be ..shd said Kostyuk, because she does know what Pegula looks like..

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 9:55 pm
by Fastbackss
Not sure if podcasts factor into journalism, but really enjoyed this episode.
He interviews a golf coach/strategist and it's interesting how much stuff translates. He spends most of time talking about "math" and making optimal decisions.
He discusses something called "scatter pattern" - and how if you hit the same shot 100 times the range it will cover - and how that needs to factor in to where your targets are
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s ... 0651760603

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:01 pm
by ashkor87
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/wh ... ill-stores
Lovely article by @meganfernandez
I have often wondered..but the range of solutions is interesting