Men’s Singles Starts 14.30
semifinals ITA L.Musetti (8) vs ESP C.Alcaraz (2)
Men’s Singles Upcoming Not before 19:00
semifinals ITA J.Sinner (1) vs SRB N.Djokovic (6)
Court SUZANNE-LENGLEN
Men’s Wheelchair Singles
Semifinals JPN T.Oda (1) vs ESP M.De La Puente (3)
Men’s Doubles Upcoming Not before 12:00
semifinals GBR J.Salisbury (8)/GBR N.Skupski (8) vs USA C.Harrison (9) USA/E.King (9)
Court SIMONNE-MATHIEU
Mixed Legends
FRA T.Golovin/FRA A.Clement vs FRA N.Dechy/FRA S.Grosjean
Women’s Doubles Upcoming Not before 13:00
semifinals
KAZ A.Danilina/SRB A.Krunic vs NOR U.Eikeri/JPN E.Hozumi
Women’s Doubles Upcoming
semifinals --- M.Andreeva (4)/--- D.Shnaider (4) vs ITA S.Errani (2)/ITA J.Paolini (2)
Court 14
Men’s Legends
FRA C.Pioline/FRA F.Santoro vs USA M.Chang/SWE M.Wilander
Men’s Wheelchair Singles
Upcoming
semifinals ARG G.Fernandez (4) vs GBR A.Hewett (2)
Women’s Legends
Upcoming
ITA F.Pennetta/ITA F.Schiavone vs CZE L.Safarova/FRA N.Tauziat
Court 7
Quad Wheelchair Doubles
final ISR G.Sasson (1)/NED N.Vink (1) vs TUR A.Kaplan/RSA D.Ramphadi
Women’s Wheelchair Singles
Upcoming
semifinals JPN Y.Kamiji (1) vs CHN X.Li
Women’s Wheelchair Singles
Upcoming
Semifinals
RSA K.Montjane vs NED A.Van Koot (2)
Men’s Wheelchair Doubles
Interrupted
semifinals
1h11
not before 14:30
FRA S.Houdet/JPN T.Oda vs ESP D.Caverzaschi/ARG G.Fernandez
30 6 3
40 2 4
Women’s Wheelchair Doubles
Upcoming Not before 15:30
final
JPN Y.Kamiji/RSA K.Montjane vs CHN X.Li (2)/CHN Z.Wang (2)
Court 6
Boys’ Singles
semifinals
GER M.Schoenhaus vs BUL I.Ivanov (9)
Boys’ Singles
Upcoming
semifinals
GER N.Mcdonald vs JPN R.Tabata (13)
Girls’ Doubles
Upcoming
semifinals CZE A.Kovackova (3)/CZE J.Kovackova (3) vs USA A.Penickova (2)/USA K.Penickova (2)
Boys’ Doubles
Upcoming
semifinals USA N.Johnston (7)/USA B.Willwerth (7) vs GBR O.Bonding (8)/USA J.Leach (8)
Court 10
Girls’ Singles
semifinals AUS E.Jones (1) vs AUT L.Tagger
Girls’ Singles
Upcoming
Semifinals GBR H.Klugman (8) vs BUL R.Dencheva
Boys’ Doubles
Upcoming
semifinals USA K.Hance (3)/USA J.Kennedy (3) vs FIN O.Paldanius (2)/POL A.Wazny (2)
Girls’ Doubles
Upcoming
semifinals
GER E.Bennemann/GER S.Zhenikhova vs SVK M.Pohankova/AUT L.Tagger
Court TBA 1
Men’s Wheelchair Doubles
final GBR A.Hewett (1)/GBR G.Reid (1) vs S.Houdet / T.Oda or D.Caverzaschi / G.Fernandez
by ponchi101 Carlos in 4
Sinner in 4
by mick1303
Matt Bradshaw from "Coffee Break Tennis" GRILLED Tiafoe for his comments at the presser. Not a good look - soliciting for a default win.
by ponchi101 Soliciting for it is wrong.
But Muzetti should have been defaulted. Djokovic was defaulted at the USO. This was only different in the speed of the ball
by dryrunguy That was unfortunate. But damn, Musetti has A LOT to be proud of--especially over the past few months.
by ashkor87 This board is coming up too late for me..we don't all live in the US!!
by ashkor87 Errani totally dominating the doubles..moving perfectly, confusing her opponents utterly
by ashkor87 Errani totally dominating the doubles..moving perfectly, confusing her opponents utterly
by mick1303
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 2:26 pm
Soliciting for it is wrong.
But Muzetti should have been defaulted. Djokovic was defaulted at the USO. This was only different in the speed of the ball
The rule does not say anything about automatic DQ. It is on umpire discretion. And IMO this is how it shall be - surrounding circumstances could be very different. In practice the decision mostly depends on inflicted harm. In this particular case I think DQ would've been greatly disproportional. Djokovic was unlucky that his ball got to the throat. But it also was way faster than from Musetti's kick.
by ponchi101
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:16 pm
This board is coming up too late for me..we don't all live in the US!!
Look at the time stamp of the first post by Ti. This topic was posted at 8:00 PM US EST Thursday, which was 8 AM India Friday.
Ti cannot post these topics before the OoP has been posted.
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 2:26 pm
Soliciting for it is wrong.
But Muzetti should have been defaulted. Djokovic was defaulted at the USO. This was only different in the speed of the ball
The rule does not say anything about automatic DQ. It is on umpire discretion. And IMO this is how it shall be - surrounding circumstances could be very different. In practice the decision mostly depends on inflicted harm. In this particular case I think DQ would've been greatly disproportional. Djokovic was unlucky that his ball got to the throat. But it also was way faster than from Musetti's kick.
Umpire discretion. That is such a minefield, especially for the umpire.
by ponchi101
dryrunguy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:08 pm
That was unfortunately. But damn, Musetti has A LOT to be proud of--especially over the past few months.
He COULD have been proud if he had finished the match. He was hurting and he was without legs. But you don't retire because of that.
Add this to his infamous retirement against Djokovic and he is gaining the wrong reputation.
by jazzyg OMG, ponch.
Musetti definitely should not have been defaulted for kicking a ball that happened to hit a linesperson at a slow speed.
Djokovic should not have been defaulted for what he did, either, for that matter, although his action was significantly worse than Musetti's.
Rules are rules, but sometimes common sense needs to come into play.
by FredX Great reminiscence between Agassi and Andrei Medvedev on their 1999 final on TNT just now - well worth hunting down if you missed.
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:16 pm
This board is coming up too late for me..we don't all live in the US!!
Look at the time stamp of the first post by Ti. This topic was posted at 8:00 PM US EST Thursday, which was 8 AM India Friday.
Ti cannot post these topics before the OoP has been posted.
ok.. my bad.. but this happened yesterday also, I didnt see the board when I looked for it.
by ashkor87 I do see the order of play on the RG site much earlier
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:16 pm
This board is coming up too late for me..we don't all live in the US!!
Look at the time stamp of the first post by Ti. This topic was posted at 8:00 PM US EST Thursday, which was 8 AM India Friday.
Ti cannot post these topics before the OoP has been posted.
ok.. my bad.. but this happened yesterday also, I didnt see the board when I looked for it.
Order of play for the Thursday matches was posted even earlier, at 18:45 Wednesday.
It did not happen yesterday either. The first reply by another member was at 9:49 PM.
Let's say you were unable to find them, but they were there and in the correct forum.
by ponchi101
jazzyg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:59 pm
OMG, ponch.
Musetti definitely should not have been defaulted for kicking a ball that happened to hit a linesperson at a slow speed.
Djokovic should not have been defaulted for what he did, either, for that matter, although his action was significantly worse than Musetti's.
Rules are rules, but sometimes common sense needs to come into play.
My problem with common sense is how broad it is. Your common sense is not my common sense, as you can see by the example that we are in disagreement about this.
If you hit a lines person or a ball kid when you are hitting a ball in play (for example, you were stretched and on the run), ok, that is accidental. Any other situation in which you touch any person on court with a ball, you get defaulted. That is my common sense.
Remember when Nalbandian was defaulted at Queens? In that one I guess we won't disagree, and yet, no ball was in play.
jazzyg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 3:59 pm
OMG, ponch.
Musetti definitely should not have been defaulted for kicking a ball that happened to hit a linesperson at a slow speed.
Djokovic should not have been defaulted for what he did, either, for that matter, although his action was significantly worse than Musetti's.
Rules are rules, but sometimes common sense needs to come into play.
My problem with common sense is how broad it is. Your common sense is not my common sense, as you can see by the example that we are in disagreement about this.
If you hit a lines person or a ball kid when you are hitting a ball in play (for example, you were stretched and on the run), ok, that is accidental. Any other situation in which you touch any person on court with a ball, you get defaulted. That is my common sense.
Remember when Nalbandian was defaulted at Queens? In that one I guess we won't disagree, and yet, no ball was in play.
If we'll have umpires only to announce the score, we may as well replace them with another machine. Which, I think everyone would agree, will be a shame. So they do need critical responsibilities. And making such decisions is one of those responsibilities. So we will rely on their common sense in such occasions. And if majority will agree with their decisions, we'll consider them good umpires.
by mick1303 I've made a poll to check what majority here thinks about this particular case.
by mick1303 And we'll have the final everybody was waiting for...
by patrick Speaking of that, when was the last time a Slam had a number 1 and 2 in both finals? French if answer is one of the other 3 Slams?
by jazzyg They revealed it duiring the broadcast: 1984 with McEnroe vs. Lendl and Navratilova vs. Evert.
by jazzyg I'm not predicting a scoreline for the Gauff-Sabalenka final, but Gauff will be in double digits for double faults. They come in bunches when she gets tight--she had three in the first-set tiebreak alone against Keys--and the way Sabalenka crushes returns, Gauff definitely will get tight.
by ponchi101
jazzyg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 9:48 pm
They revealed it duiring the broadcast: 1984 with McEnroe vs. Lendl and Navratilova vs. Evert.
And both #1 won.
by ponchi101 Djokovic said, after the loss, that this could have been his last match at RG. Obviously, thoughts like that after such a loss should be taken with a grain of salt, but more indications that he is also very near the end.
by jazzyg
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:41 am
Carlos in 4
Sinner in 4
If Djokovic had connected on that forehand down the line on his third set point in the third set, you would have been spot on because the fourth set would have gone quickly in Sinner's favor.
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 1:41 am
Carlos in 4
Sinner in 4
If Djokovic had connected on that forehand down the line on his third set point in the third set, you would have been spot on because the fourth set would have gone quickly in Sinner's favor.
You know my forecasting powers are iffy at best.
And it was more like Carlos in 3 1/2.
by ti-amie
by ashkor87
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 06, 2025 7:49 pm
Let's say you were unable to find them, but they were there and in the correct forum.